Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 · Sec. 23

Sec. 23. AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING AND INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS

466 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-10331/sec-23

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 23 AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING AND INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS **[**[7 U.S.C. 2032](/us/usc/t7/s2032)**]** ###
(a)Standards and Procedures for Reviews ####
(1)Initial reviews #####
(A)In general Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall complete a review of regulations and standards (in effect on the date of enactment of this section) for the approval of an automated data processing and information retrieval system maintained by a State (hereinafter in this section referred to as a “system”) to determine the extent to which the regulations and standards contribute to a more effective and efficient program. #####
(B)Revision of regulations The Secretary shall revise regulations (in effect on the date of enactment of this Act) to take into account the findings of the review conducted under subparagraph (A). #####
(C)Incorporation of existing systems The regulations shall require States to incorporate all or part of systems in use elsewhere, unless a State documents that the design and operation of an alternative system would be less costly. The Secretary shall establish standards to define the extent of modification of the systems for which payments will be made under either section 16(a) or 16(g). #####
(D)Implementation Proposed systems shall meet standards established by the Secretary for timely implementation of proper changes. #####
(E)Cost effectiveness Criteria for the approval of a system under section 16(g) shall include the cost effectiveness of the proposed system. On implementation of the approved system, a State shall document the actual cost and benefits of the system. ####
(2)Operational reviews The Secretary shall conduct such reviews as are necessary to ensure that systems— #####
(A)comply with conditions of initial funding approvals; and #####
(B)adequately support program delivery in compliance with this Act and regulations issued under this Act. ###
(b)Standards for Approval of Systems ####
(1)In general After conducting the review required under subsection (a), the Secretary shall establish standards for approval of systems. ####
(2)Implementation A State shall implement the standards established by the Secretary within a reasonable period of time, as determined by the Secretary. ####
(3)Periodic compliance reviews The Secretary shall conduct appropriate periodic reviews of systems to ensure compliance with the standards established by the Secretary. ###
(c)Report Not later than October 1, 1993, the Secretary shall report to the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate on the extent to which State agencies have developed and are operating effective systems that support supplemental nutrition assistance program delivery in compliance with this Act and regulations issued under this Act. **[**SEC. 24. **[**[7 U.S.C. 2033](/us/usc/t7/s2033)**]** TERRITORY OF AMERICAN SAMOA.19 19Sec. 4124(b) of P.L. 107–171 (116 Stat. 325) repealed sec. 24.**]**
Connectionstraces to 2
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 116 Stat. 325
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 23
AUTOMATED DATA PROCESSING AND INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS
Stat.116 Stat. 325
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.