Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · Foreign and Economic Espionage Penalty Enhancement Act of 2012 · Sec. 3

Sec. 3. REVIEW BY THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION

421 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-10171/sec-3

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 3 REVIEW BY THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION **[**[28 U.S.C. 994 note](/us/usc/t28/s994)**]** ###
(a)In General Pursuant to its authority under section 994(p) of title 28, United States Code, the United States Sentencing Commission shall review and, if appropriate, amend the Federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements applicable to persons convicted of offenses relating to the transmission or attempted transmission of a stolen trade secret outside of the United States or economic espionage, in order to reflect the intent of Congress that penalties for such offenses under the Federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements appropriately, reflect the seriousness of these offenses, account for the potential and actual harm caused by these offenses, and provide adequate deterrence against such offenses. ###
(b)Requirements In carrying out this section, the United States Sentencing Commission shall— ####
(1)consider the extent to which the Federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements appropriately account for the simple misappropriation of a trade secret, including the sufficiency of the existing enhancement for these offenses to address the seriousness of this conduct; ####
(2)consider whether additional enhancements in the Federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements are appropriate to account for— #####
(A)the transmission or attempted transmission of a stolen trade secret outside of the United States; and #####
(B)the transmission or attempted transmission of a stolen trade secret outside of the United States that is committed or attempted to be committed for the benefit of a foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or foreign agent; ####
(3)ensure the Federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements reflect the seriousness of these offenses and the need to deter such conduct; ####
(4)ensure reasonable consistency with other relevant directives, Federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements, and related Federal statutes; ####
(5)make any necessary conforming changes to the Federal sentencing guidelines and policy statements; and ####
(6)ensure that the Federal sentencing guidelines adequately meet the purposes of sentencing as set forth in section 3553(a)(2) of title 18, United States Code. ###
(c)Consultation In carrying out the review required under this section, the Commission shall consult with individuals or groups representing law enforcement, owners of trade secrets, victims of economic espionage offenses, the United States Department of Justice, the United States Department of Homeland Security, the United States Department of State and the Office of the United States Trade Representative. ###
(d)Review Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall complete its consideration and review under this section.
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Sec. 3
REVIEW BY THE UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.