Sec. 3. LAND TRANSFER
412 words·~2 min read·
/statute-compilations/comps-10119/sec-3A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
## SEC. 3 LAND TRANSFER Section 121 of the Native American Technical Corrections Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-204; 118 Stat. 544) is amended— ####
(1)by striking subsection
(b)and inserting the following: > > ### “(b) Description of Land > > The land referred to in subsection
(a)is land comprising approximately 86.87 acres in T. 14 S., R. 1 E., San Bernardino Meridian, San Diego County, California, and described more particularly as follows: > > > #### “(1) > > The approximately 69.85 acres located in Section 21 and described as— > > > ##### “(A) > > SW¼ SW¼, excepting the north 475 feet; > > > ##### “(B) > > W½ SE¼ SW¼, excepting the north 475 feet; > > > ##### “(C) > > E½ SE¼ SW¼, excepting the north 350 feet; and > > > ##### “(D) > > the portion of W½ SE¼ that lies southwesterly of the following line: Beginning at the intersection of the southerly line of said SE¼ of Section 21 with the westerly boundary of Rancho Canada De San Vicente Y Mesa Del Padre Barona as shown on United States Government Resurvey approved January 21, 1939, and thence northwesterly along said boundary to an intersection with the westerly line of said SE¼. > > > #### “(2) > > The approximately 17.02 acres located in Section 28 and described as NW¼ NW¼, excepting the east 750 feet.” > ; and ####
(2)by adding at the end the following: > > ### “(d) Clarifications > > > #### “(1) Effect on section > > The provisions of subsection
(c)shall apply to the land described in subsection (b), as in effect on the day after the date of enactment of the Barona Band of Mission Indians Land Transfer Clarification Act of 2012. > > > #### “(2) Effect on private land > > The parcel of private, non-Indian land referenced in subsection
(a)and described in subsection (b), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of the Barona Band of Mission Indians Land Transfer Clarification Act of 2012, but excluded from the revised description of the land in subsection
(b)was not intended to be— > > > ##### “(A) > > held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Band; or > > > ##### “(B) > > considered to be a part of the reservation of the Band.” > .
Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
- Pub. L. 108-204
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources