Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · STATUTE-COMPILATIONS · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 · Sec. 1080

Sec. 1080. REPORT ON APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR SEA BATTLE CONCEPT

477 words·~2 min read·/statute-compilations/comps-10045/sec-1080

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

## SEC. 1080 REPORT ON APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AIR SEA BATTLE CONCEPT ###
(a)Report Required Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to Congress a report on the approved Air Sea Battle Concept, as required by the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review Report, and a plan for the implementation of the concept. ###
(b)Elements The report required by subsection
(a)shall include, at a minimum, the following: ####
(1)A description of the approved Air Sea Battle Concept. ####
(2)An identification and assessment of— #####
(A)the materiel solutions required to employ the concept in support of approved operational plans and contingency plans; and #####
(B)the risks to approved operational plans and contingency plans resulting from unfulfilled materiel solutions identified pursuant to subparagraph (A). ####
(3)A summary of the implementation plan, including— #####
(A)an assessment of the risks to implementation of the approved concept within the current and programmed force structure, capabilities, and capacity; #####
(B)a description of the criteria that will be used to measure progress toward full implementation of the concept; and #####
(C)a timeline for implementation of the concept. ####
(4)A description and assessment of how current research, development, and acquisition priorities in the program of record deliver or fail to deliver the materiel solutions identified pursuant to paragraph (2)(A). ####
(5)An identification, in order of priority, of the five most critical materiel solutions identified pursuant to paragraph (2)(A) requiring increased or sustained investment for the implementation of the Air Sea Battle Concept. ####
(6)An identification, in order of priority, of how the Department will offset the increased costs required by implementation of the Air Sea Battle Concept, including an explanation of what force structure, capabilities, and programs will be reduced and how potentially increased risks based on those reductions will be managed relative to other strategic requirements. ####
(7)A list of any new organization required to implement the concept, including an explanation of the function of each organization and why such functions cannot be assigned to existing organizations. ####
(8)A description and assessment of the estimated incremental increases in costs, including the cost of any new organization identified pursuant to paragraph (7), and savings from implementing the Air Sea Battle Concept, including the most significant reasons for those increased costs and savings. ####
(9)A description and assessment of the contributions required from allies and other international partners, including the identification and plans for management of related risks, in order to implement the Air Sea Battle Concept. ####
(10)Such other matters relating to the development and implementation of the Air Sea Battle Concept as the Secretary considers appropriate. ###
(c)Form The report required by subsection
(a)shall be submitted in both unclassified and classified form.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.