Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · South Dakota · Title 62 · Chapter 62-5

62-5-11. Requirements for acceptance of irrevocable letter of credit--Definitions.

223 words·~1 min read·/sd/title-62/chapter-62-5/62-5-11

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

As used in §§ 62-5-10 to 62-5-16 , inclusive, an irrevocable letter of credit shall be accepted only if it is clean, irrevocable, and contains an evergreen clause.
Terms used in §§ 62-5-10 to 62-5-16 , inclusive, mean:
(1)"Clean," a letter of credit that is not conditioned on the delivery of any other documents or materials;
(2)"Irrevocable," a letter of credit that cannot be modified or revoked without the consent of the beneficiary, once the beneficiary is established;
(3)"Evergreen clause," a clause specifically stating that the expiration of a letter of credit will not take place without a sixty-day notice by the issuer. If prior notice of expiration is not given by the issuer, the letter of credit is automatically extended for one year.
A clean irrevocable letter of credit shall be accepted only if it is in the form prescribed by §§ 62-5-10 to 62-5-16 , inclusive, and is issued by a financial institution that is authorized to engage in banking in any of the fifty states or under the laws of the United States and whose business is substantially confined to banking, and that has a long-term debt rating by a recognized national rating agency of investment grade or better. If no long-term debt rating is available, the financial institution shall have the equivalent investment grade financial characteristics.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.