Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · South Dakota · Title 58 · Chapter 58-17

58-17H-19. Determinations to be issued in timely manner--Process to ensure consistency.

222 words·~1 min read·/sd/title-58/chapter-58-17/58-17h-19·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A health carrier shall issue utilization review and benefit determinations in a timely manner pursuant to the requirements of §§ 58-17H-27 to 58-17H-32 , inclusive, and §§ 58-17H-40 to 58-17H-48 , inclusive. A health carrier shall have a process to ensure that utilization reviewers apply clinical review criteria in conducting utilization review consistently.
If a health carrier fails to strictly adhere to the requirements of §§ 58-17H-27 to 58-17H-32 , inclusive, and §§ 58-17H-40 to 58-17H-48 , inclusive, with respect to making utilization review and benefit determinations of a benefit request or claim, the covered person shall be deemed to have exhausted the provisions of chapters 58-17G and 58-17H , and may take action regardless of whether the health carrier asserts that the carrier substantially complied with the requirements of §§ 58-17H-27 to 58-17H-32 , inclusive, and §§ 58-17H-40 to 58-17H-48 , inclusive, as applicable, or that any error it committed was de minimus.
Any covered person may file a request for external review in accordance with rules promulgated by the director. In addition to the external review rights a covered person is entitled to pursue any available remedies under state or federal law on the basis that the health carrier failed to provide a reasonable internal claims and appeals process that would yield a decision on the merits of the claim.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.