Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · South Dakota · Title 37 · Chapter 37-36

37-36-3. Factors for bad faith assertion of infringement.

313 words·~1 min read·/sd/title-37/chapter-37-36/37-36-3

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

A court may consider the following factors as evidence that a person has made a bad faith assertion of patent infringement:
(1)The demand letter does not contain the following information:
(a)The patent number;
(b)The name and address of the patent owner and assignee, if any; or
(c)Factual allegations concerning the specific areas in which the target's product, service, or technology infringe the patent or are covered by the claim in the patent;
(2)Prior to sending the demand letter, the person fails to conduct an analysis comparing the claim in the patent to the target's product, service, or technology, or such an analysis was done but does not identify the specific area in which the product, service, or technology is covered by the claim in the patent;
(3)The demand letter lacks the information described in subdivision
(1)of this section, the target requests the information, and the person fails to provide the information within a reasonable period of time;
(4)The demand letter demands payment of a license fee or a response within an unreasonably short period of time;
(5)The person offers to license the patent for an amount that is not based on a reasonable estimate of the value of the license;
(6)The claim of patent infringement is meritless and the person knew, or should have known, that the claim is meritless;
(7)The claim of patent infringement is deceptive;
(8)The person, a subsidiary, or an affiliate has previously filed or threatened to file a lawsuit based on the same or a similar claim of patent infringement and:
(a)The threat or lawsuit lacked the information described in subdivision
(1)of this section; or
(b)The person attempted to enforce the claim of patent infringement in litigation and a court found the claim to be meritless;
(9)Any other factor the court finds relevant.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.