Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · South Dakota · Title 34 · Chapter 34-6

34A-6-1.13. Notice and opportunity for hearing--Issuance of permit--Contested cases--Grounds for denial.

326 words·~1 min read·/sd/title-34/chapter-34-6/34a-6-1-13·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

The board or the secretary, after public notice and opportunity for public hearing, may issue a permit with reasonable terms and conditions for installation, establishment, modification, operation, or abandonment of a solid waste facility. After publication of the secretary's recommendation on a permit application as provided for under § 34A-6-1.14 , if no petition for contested case is timely filed, the recommendation of the secretary becomes the final determination on the application.
If an uncontested recommendation is for approval or conditional approval of the application, the permit shall be issued by the secretary consistent with the secretary's recommendation. The board may issue a permit in a contested case on the basis of information in the application itself or on the basis of evidence received at a hearing, if any, on the matter only if the board finds that the facility will meet the requirements of §§ 34A-6-1.1 to 34A-6-1.38 , inclusive, and is in the public interest.
The board may deny any permit in a contested case if it finds that the applicant, or any officer, director, or manager of the applicant, or shareholder owning twenty percent or more of its capital stock, beneficial or otherwise, or other person conducting or managing the affairs of the applicant or of the proposed permitted premises in whole or part:
(1)Has misrepresented a material fact in applying to the board for a permit;
(2)Has been convicted of a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude;
(3)Has violated the environmental laws of any state or the United States;
(4)Has had any permit revoked under the environmental laws of any state or the United States; or
(5)Has otherwise demonstrated through previous actions the lack of character or competency to reliably carry out the obligations imposed by §§ 34A-6-1.1 to 34A-6-1.38 , inclusive.
For the purpose of this section, the conduct and reputation of any owner or proposed manager or operator may be imputed to the applicant.
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.