Proposed Rules. Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)

4,653 words·~21 min read·/register/2026/02/25/2026-03783·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU 12 CFR Part 1002 [Docket No. CFPB-2025-0039] RIN 3170-AB54 Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B) Correction In proposed rule document 2025-19864, appearing on pages 50901-50923 in the issue of Thursday, November 13, 2025, make the following correction to conform with the rule document as it was submitted by the Bureau on November 7, 2025: The regulatory text beginning on page 50920, in the third column, in the 3rd line, should read as follows:

List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1002 Banks, Banking, Civil rights, Consumer protection, Credit, Credit unions, Marital status discrimination, National banks, Penalties, Religious discrimination, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Savings associations, Sex discrimination. Authority and Issuance For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Bureau proposes to amend Regulation B, 12 CFR part 1002, as set forth below: PART 1002—EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY ACT (REGULATION B) ▪ 1.

The authority citation for part 1002 continues to read as follows: Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5512, 5581; 15 U.S.C. 1691b. Subpart B is also issued under 15 U.S.C. 1691c-2. SUBPART A—GENERAL ▪ 2. Amend § 1002.4 by revising paragraph

(b)to read as follows: § 1002.4 General rules.

(b)Discouragement. A creditor shall not make any oral or written statement, in advertising or otherwise, directed at applicants or prospective applicants that the creditor knows or should know would cause a reasonable person to believe that the creditor would deny, or would grant on less favorable terms, a credit application by the applicant or prospective applicant because of the applicant or prospective applicant's prohibited basis characteristic(s). For purposes of this paragraph (b), oral or written statements are spoken or written words, or visual images such as symbols, photographs, or videos. ▪ 3. Amend § 1002.6 by revising paragraph

(a)to read as follows: § 1002.6 Rules concerning evaluation of applications.

(a)General rule concerning use of information. Except as otherwise provided in the Act and this part, a creditor may consider any information obtained, so long as the information is not used to discriminate against an applicant on a prohibited basis. The Act does not provide that the “effects test” applies for determining whether there is discrimination in violation of the Act. ▪ 4. In § 1002.8, revise paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and (ii), the heading of paragraph (b), and paragraphs (b)(2) and (c), and add paragraphs (b)(3) and (4), to read as follows: § 1002.8 Special purpose credit programs.

(a)* * *

(3)* * *

(i)* * *

(A)Identifies the class of persons that the program is designed to benefit;

(B)Sets forth the procedures and standards for extending credit pursuant to the program;

(C)Provides evidence of the need for the program;

(D)Explains why, under the organization's standards of creditworthiness, the class of persons would not receive such credit in the absence of the program; and

(E)When the persons in the class are required to share one or more common characteristics that would otherwise be a prohibited basis, explains why meeting the special social needs addressed by the program:

(1)Necessitates that its participants share the specific common characteristics that would otherwise be a prohibited basis; and

(2)Cannot be accomplished through a program that does not use otherwise prohibited bases as participant eligibility criteria; and

(ii)The program is established and administered to extend credit to a class of persons who, under the organization's standards of creditworthiness, would not receive such credit.

(b)Controlling provisions—

(2)Common characteristics. A program described in paragraphs (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this section qualifies as a special purpose credit program only if it was established and is administered so as not to discriminate against an applicant on any prohibited basis; however, except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this section, all program participants may be required to share one or more common characteristics that would otherwise be a prohibited basis so long as the program was not established and is not administered with the purpose of evading the requirements of the Act or this part.

(3)Prohibited common characteristics. A special purpose credit program described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section shall not use the race, color, national origin, or sex, or any combination thereof, of the applicant, as a common characteristic or factor in determining eligibility for the program.

(4)Otherwise prohibited bases in for-profit programs. Subject to paragraph (b)(3) of this section, a special purpose credit program described in paragraph (a)(3) of this section may require its participants to share one or more common characteristics that would otherwise be a prohibited basis only if the for-profit organization provides evidence for each participant who receives credit through the program that in the absence of the program the participant would not receive such credit as a result of those specific characteristics.

(c)Special rule concerning requests and use of information. If participants in a special purpose credit program described in paragraph

(a)of this section are required to possess one or more common characteristics that would otherwise be a prohibited basis and if the program otherwise satisfies the requirements of paragraphs

(a)and

(b)of this section, a creditor may request and consider information regarding the common characteristic(s) in determining the applicant's eligibility for the program. ▪ 5. Amend § 1002.15 by revising paragraph (d)(1)(ii) to read as follows: § 1002.15 Incentives for self-testing and self-correction.

(d)* * *

(1)* * *

(ii)By a government agency or an applicant in any proceeding or civil action in which a violation of the Act or this part is alleged. ▪ 6. In Supplement I to part 1002: ▪ a. Under Section 1002.2—Definitions, revise Paragraph 2(p)(4), including the heading. ▪ b. Under Section 1002.4—General Rules, revise Paragraph 4(b), including the heading. ▪ c. Under Section 1002.6—Rules Concerning Evaluation of Applications, revise 6(a)—General rule concerning use of information, by revising Paragraph (6)(a)(2). ▪ d. Under Section 1002.8—Special Purpose Credit Programs, revise 8(a)—Standards for programs by revising Paragraph (8)(a)(5), revise 8(b)—Rules in other sections by revising the heading and adding Paragraph (8)(b)(2), revise 8(c)—Special rule concerning requests and use of information by revising Paragraph (8)(c)(2). The revisions and additions read as follows: Supplement I to Part 1002—Official Interpretations Section 1002.2—Definitions 2(p) Empirically derived and other credit scoring systems. 4. Disparate treatment. An empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring system may include age as a predictive factor (provided that the age of an elderly applicant is not assigned a negative factor or value). Besides age, no other prohibited basis may be used as a variable. Generally, credit scoring systems treat all applicants objectively and thus avoid problems of disparate treatment. In cases where a credit scoring system is used in conjunction with individual discretion, disparate treatment could conceivably occur in the evaluation process. Section 1002.4—General Rules Paragraph 4(b). 1. Discouragement. Generally, the regulation's protections apply only to persons who have requested or received an extension of credit. In keeping with the purpose of the Act—to promote the availability of credit on a nondiscriminatory basis—§ 1002.4(b) prohibits creditors from making oral or written statements directed at applicants or prospective applicants that the creditor knows or should know would cause a reasonable person to believe that the creditor would deny their credit application, or would grant it on less favorable terms, because of their prohibited basis characteristic(s). For purposes of § 1002.4(b), encouraging statements directed at one group of consumers cannot discourage other consumers who were not the intended recipients of the statements. i. Statements prohibited by § 1002.4(b) include: A. A statement that the applicant should not bother to apply, after the applicant states that he is retired. B. Statements directed at the general public that express a discriminatory preference or a policy of exclusion against consumers based on one or more prohibited basis characteristics in violation of the Act. C. The use of interview scripts that discourage applications on a prohibited basis. ii. Statements not prohibited by § 1002.4(b) include: A. Statements directed at one group of consumers, encouraging that group of consumers to apply for credit. B. Statements in support of local law enforcement. C. Statements recommending that, before buying a home in a particular neighborhood, consumers investigate, for example, the neighborhood's schools, its proximity to grocery stores, and its crime statistics. D. Statements encouraging consumers to seek out resources to develop their financial literacy. Section 1002.6—Rules Concerning Evaluation of Applications 6(a) General rule concerning use of information. 1. General. When evaluating an application for credit, a creditor generally may consider any information obtained. However, a creditor may not consider in its evaluation of creditworthiness any information that it is barred by § 1002.5 from obtaining or from using for any purpose other than to conduct a self-test under § 1002.15. 2. Disparate treatment. The Act prohibits practices that discriminate on a prohibited basis regarding any aspect of a credit transaction. The Act does not provide for the prohibition of practices that are facially neutral as to prohibited bases, except to the extent that facially neutral criteria function as proxies for protected characteristics designed or applied with the intention of advantaging or disadvantaging individuals based on protected characteristics. Section 1002.8—Special Purpose Credit Programs 8(a) Standards for programs. 1. Determining qualified programs. The Bureau does not determine whether individual programs qualify for special purpose credit status, or whether a particular program benefits an “economically disadvantaged class of persons.” The agency or creditor administering or offering the loan program must make these decisions regarding the status of its program. 2. Compliance with a program authorized by Federal or state law. A creditor does not violate Regulation B when it complies in good faith with a regulation promulgated by a government agency implementing a special purpose credit program under § 1002.8(a)(1). It is the agency's responsibility to promulgate a regulation that is consistent with Federal and state law. 3. Expressly authorized. Credit programs authorized by Federal or state law include programs offered pursuant to Federal, state, or local statute, regulation or ordinance, or pursuant to judicial or administrative order. 4. Creditor liability. A refusal to grant credit to an applicant is not a violation of the Act or regulation if the applicant does not meet the eligibility requirements under a special purpose credit program. 5. Determining need. In designing a special purpose credit program under § 1002.8(a)(3), a for-profit organization must determine that the program will benefit a class of people who would otherwise be denied credit. This determination can be based on a broad analysis using the organization's own research or data from outside sources, including governmental reports and studies. For example, a creditor might design new products to reach consumers who would not meet its traditional standards of creditworthiness due to such factors as credit inexperience or the use of credit sources that may not report to consumer reporting agencies. Or, a bank could review Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data along with demographic data for its assessment area. 6. Elements of the program. The written plan must contain information that supports the need for the particular program. The plan also must either state a specific period of time for which the program will last, or contain a statement regarding when the program will be reevaluated to determine if there is a continuing need for it. 8(b) Controlling provisions. 1. Applicability of rules. A creditor that rejects an application because the applicant does not meet the eligibility requirements (common characteristic or financial need, for example) must nevertheless notify the applicant of action taken as required by § 1002.9. 2. Use of common characteristics. Section 1002.8(b)(2) permits a creditor to determine eligibility for a special purpose credit program using one or more common characteristics that would otherwise be a prohibited basis only so long as that section's requirements, the requirements of § 1002.8(b)(3) and (4), and the other requirements of this part are satisfied. Under § 1002.8(b)(2), once the characteristics of the program's class of participants are established, the creditor is prohibited from discriminating among potential participants on a prohibited basis. 8(c) Special rule concerning requests and use of information. 1. Request of prohibited basis information. This section permits a creditor to request and consider certain information that would otherwise be prohibited by §§ 1002.5 and 1002.6 to determine an applicant's eligibility for a particular program. 2. Example. An example of a program under which the creditor can ask for and consider information about a prohibited basis is an energy conservation program to assist the elderly, for which the creditor must consider the applicant's age. [FR Doc. C1-2025-19864 Filed 2-24-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 0099-01-D DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2026-1340; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00430-T] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Embraer S.A. (Type Certificate Previously Held by Yaborã Indústria Aeronáutica S.A.; Embraer S.A.) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive

(AD)for certain Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 190-100 ECJ airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a manufacturing quality escape concerning certain overheat detection system

(ODS)sensing elements. This proposed AD would require a detailed inspection of certain ODS sensing elements of the airplane bleed lines and replacement, if necessary. This proposed AD would also prohibit the installation of affected parts. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 13, 2026. ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR 11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods: • *Federal eRulemaking Portal:* Go to *regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • *Fax:* 202-493-2251. • *Mail:* U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. • *Hand Delivery:* Deliver to Mail address above between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. *AD Docket:* You may examine the AD docket at *regulations.gov* under Docket No. FAA-2026-1340; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above. *Material Incorporated by Reference:* • For Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil

(ANAC)material identified in this proposed AD, contact ANAC, Aeronautical Products Certification Branch (GGCP), Rua Dr. Orlando Feirabend Filho, 230—Centro Empresarial Aquarius—Torre B—Andares 14 a 18, Parque Residencial Aquarius, CEP 12.246-190—São José dos Campos—SP, Brazil; telephone 55

(12)3203-6600; email *pac@anac.gov.br.* You may find this material on the ANAC website at *sistemas.anac.gov.br/certificacao/DA/DAE.asp.* It is also available at *regulations.gov* under Docket No. FAA-2026-1340. • You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Tsang, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3959; email: *Nicole.S.Tsang@faa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Comments Invited The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this proposal. Send your comments using a method listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include “Docket No. FAA-2026-1340; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00430-T” at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposal because of those comments. Except for Confidential Business Information

(CBI)as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to *regulations.gov,* including any personal information you provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM. Confidential Business Information CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act

(FOIA)(5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as “PROPIN.” The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Nicole Tsang, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3959; email: *Nicole.S.Tsang@faa.gov.* Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. Background ANAC, which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued ANAC AD 2024-07-01, effective July 31, 2024 (ANAC AD 2024-07-01) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Embraer S.A. Model ERJ 190-100 ECJ airplanes. The MCAI states that a quality escape occurred during manufacturing concerning certain ODS sensing elements produced before January 31, 2021. A defective sensing element may not be able to detect a thermal bleed leak, which is a latent failure. This condition, if not addressed, could lead to an undetected thermal bleed leak that could start an ignition source in the fuel tank, damaging some electronic boxes and exposing the wing structure to high temperature gradients and unexpected thermal loads. The FAA has determined that this condition could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at *regulations.gov* under Docket No. FAA-2026-1340. Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51 ANAC AD 2024-07-01 specifies procedures for a detailed inspection of certain ODS sensing elements of the airplane bleed lines and replacement, if necessary. ANAC AD 2024-07-01 also prohibits the installation of an affected ODS sensing element unless the affected part passed an inspection, indicated by a marking on one face of the connector hex nut. This material is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. FAA's Determination These products have been approved by the civil aviation authority of another country and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, that authority has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified in ANAC AD 2024-07-01 described previously, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD. Explanation of Required Compliance Information In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation authority

(CAA)ADs as the primary source of information for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the FAA proposes to incorporate ANAC AD 2024-07-01 by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with ANAC AD 2024-07-01 in its entirety through that incorporation, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD. Material required by ANAC AD 2024-07-01 for compliance will be available at *regulations.gov* under Docket No. FAA-2026-1340 after the FAA final rule is published. Costs of Compliance The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would affect 8 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this proposed AD: Estimated Costs for Required Actions Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators 108 work-hours × $85 per hour = $9,180 $0 $9,180 $73,440 The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base a cost estimate for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed AD. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed regulation:

(1)Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866,

(2)Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and

(3)Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive: **Embraer S.A. (Type Certificate Previously Held by Yaborã Indústria Aeronáutica S.A.; Embraer S.A.):** Docket No. FAA-2026-1340; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00430-T.

(a)Comments Due Date The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive

(AD)by April 13, 2026.

(b)Affected ADs None.

(c)Applicability This AD applies to Embraer S.A. (Type Certificate previously held by Yaborã Indústria Aeronáutica S.A.; Embraer S.A.) Model ERJ 190-100 ECJ airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil

(ANAC)AD 2024-07-01, effective July 31, 2024 (ANAC AD 2024-07-01).

(d)Subject Air Transport Association

(ATA)of America Code 26, Fire Protection; 36, Pneumatic.

(e)Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by a manufacturing quality escape concerning certain overheat detection system

(ODS)sensing elements. The FAA is issuing this AD to address defective sensing elements. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could lead to an undetected thermal bleed leak that could start an ignition source in the fuel tank, damaging some electronic boxes and exposing the wing structure to high temperature gradients and unexpected thermal loads, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane.

(f)Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done.

(g)Requirements Except as specified in paragraph

(h)of this AD: Comply with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in accordance with, ANAC AD 2024-07-01.

(h)Exceptions to ANAC AD 2024-07-01

(1)Where ANAC AD 2024-07-01 refers to its effective date, this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.

(2)Where paragraphs (b)(1) and (c)(1) of ANAC AD 2024-07-01 specify to inspect ODS sensing elements at various locations, this AD requires adding “in accordance with Embraer Service Bulletin 190LIN-36-0013, Revision 03, dated April 20, 2024; or later revisions approved by ANAC”.

(3)Where paragraphs

(b)and

(c)of ANAC AD 2024-07-01 specify on-condition actions based on the results of the ODS sensing element inspections required by paragraphs (b)(1) and (c)(1) of ANAC AD 2024-07-01, this AD requires performing all applicable on-condition actions before further flight after each inspection.

(4)This AD does not adopt paragraph

(f)of ANAC AD 2024-07-01.

(i)Additional AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD:

(1)*Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs):* The Manager, AIR-520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the Continued Operational Safety Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph

(j)of this AD and email to: *AMOC@faa.gov.* Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.

(2)*Contacting the Manufacturer:* For any requirement in this AD to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, AIR-520, Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA; or ANAC; or ANAC's authorized Designee. If approved by the ANAC Designee, the approval must include the Designee's authorized signature.

(3)*Required for Compliance (RC):* Except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if any material contains steps in the Accomplishment Instructions or figures that are labeled as RC, the instructions in RC steps, including subparagraphs under an RC step and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply with this AD; any steps including substeps under those steps, that are not identified as RC are recommended. The instructions in steps, including substeps under those steps, not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the instructions identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to instructions identified as RC require approval of an AMOC. If a step or substep is labeled “RC Exempt,” then the RC requirement is removed from that step or substep.

(j)Additional Information For more information about this AD, contact Nicole Tsang, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: 206-231-3959; email: *Nicole.S.Tsang@faa.gov.*

(k)Material Incorporated by Reference

(1)The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of the material listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2)You must use this material as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.

(i)Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil

(ANAC)AD 2024-07-01, effective July 31, 2024.

(ii)[Reserved]

(3)For ANAC material identified in this AD, contact ANAC, Aeronautical Products Certification Branch (GGCP), Rua Dr. Orlando Feirabend Filho, 230—Centro Empresarial Aquarius—Torre B—Andares 14 a 18, Parque Residencial Aquarius, CEP 12.246-190—São José dos Campos—SP, Brazil; telephone 55

(12)3203-6600; email *pac@anac.gov.br.* You may find this material on the ANAC website at *sistemas.anac.gov.br/certificacao/DA/DAE.asp.*

(4)You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.

(5)You may view this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov.* Issued on February 23, 2026. Lona C. Saccomando, Acting Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate Management Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2026-03783 Filed 2-24-26; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 10

Traces to 10 documents

U.S. Code

CFR