Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2026-02-19 · National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Department of Commerce (Department) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

745 words·~3 min read·/register/2026/02/19/2026-03307

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology 15 CFR Part 272 [Docket No. 260210-0043] RIN 0693-AB73 Eliminating Obsolete Marking Requirements for Toy, Look-Alike, and Imitation Firearms AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Department of Commerce (Department). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: By this rule, NIST removes its regulation setting forth marking requirements for toy, look-alike, and imitation firearms.
Pursuant to statutory amendments made by the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022, the subject regulation now lacks an underlying statutory authorization and has been rendered obsolete by the new, operative marking requirements issued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). The removal of the subject NIST regulation is therefore necessary to reflect the current state of the underlying law and to eliminate obsolete regulatory language. This action is intended to minimize the risk of public confusion regarding the applicable marking requirements and governing authority for toy, look-alike, and imitation firearms and to promote administrative efficiency.
DATES: The rule is effective February 19, 2026. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Sweeney, Senior Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, at
(202)482-1395. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action eliminates NIST's regulation at 15 CFR part 272, which sets forth various marking requirements for toy, look-alike, and imitation firearms. Part 272 was promulgated by a final rule published on May 5, 1989 (54 FR 19358), to implement Section 4 of the Federal Energy Management Improvement Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-615), codified at 15 U.S.C. 5001. In 2022, as part of the CHIPS and Science Act, Section 4 was amended to replace the Department (and NIST) with CPSC as the relevant agency. *See* Public Law 117-167, 136 Stat. 1366, 1492. CPSC has since promulgated the new, operative marking requirements for toy, look-alike, and imitation firearms at 16 CFR part 1272. In sum, NIST's regulation at 15 CFR part 272 is now no longer authorized by the underlying statute, and it also has been rendered obsolete by CPSC's regulation at 16 CFR part 1272. The elimination of 15 CFR part 272 is therefore necessary to reflect Congress's amendment of 15 U.S.C. 5001, to remove outdated and obsolete regulatory language, and to minimize the risk of public confusion regarding the status and applicability of both 15 CFR part 272 and 16 CFR part 1272. Regulatory Classifications A. Administrative Procedure Act Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Department finds good cause to waive the prior notice and opportunity for public participation requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act for this final rule. The Department considers this rule to be uncontroversial, and has determined that prior notice and opportunity for public participation is unnecessary, because this rule only removes a regulation that lacks a valid statutory authorization, no longer serves any purpose, and poses some risk of confusing the public; public participation would not justify the continued maintenance of 15 CFR part 272 under the Department's regulatory policy. For the same reason, the Department has determined that delaying the effectiveness of this elimination would be contrary to the public interest. Eliminating part 272, an obsolete regulation that poses some risk of confusion, will immediately benefit the public at little to no cost. The Department therefore finds good cause to waive the public notice and comment period under 553(b)(B) and to waive the 30-day delay in effectiveness under 553(d). B. Executive Orders 12866, 14192, and 13132 The Office of Management and Budget has determined this rule is not significant pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 12866. This rule is an E.O. 14192 deregulatory action. This rule does not contain policies having federalism implications as the term is defined in E.O. 13132. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public participation are not required to be given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.* ) are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required, and none has been prepared. D. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule will not impose additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.* List of Subjects for 15 CFR Part 272 Labeling, Consumer protection, Safety. Alicia Chambers, NIST Executive Secretariat. PART 272—[REMOVED AND RESERVED] Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above and under the authority of 15 U.S.C. 277, part 272 of title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations is removed and reserved. [FR Doc. 2026-03307 Filed 2-18-26; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 6
4 references not yet in our index
  • 15 CFR 272
  • Pub. L. 100-615
  • 136 Stat. 1366
  • 16 CFR 1272
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite15 CFR 272
Pub. L.Pub. L. 100-615
Stat.136 Stat. 1366
Cite16 CFR 1272
Cites 10Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.