Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2026-02-13 · National Assessment Governing Board, U.S. Department of Education · Notices

Notices. Notice of opportunity for initial public comment prior to updating the Civics Assessment Framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

727 words·~3 min read·/register/2026/02/13/2026-02980·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [Transmittal No. 24-111] Arms Sales Notification Correction In Notice document 2025-22754 beginning on page 57963 in the issue of Monday, December 15, 2025, make the following corrections: On pages 57964 and 57965 the Arms Sales Notifications for August 25, 2022 should be removed. [FR Doc. C1-2025-22754 Filed 2-12-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505-01-D DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION National Assessment Governing Board Seeking Initial Public Comment Prior To Updating the Civics Assessment Framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP)AGENCY: National Assessment Governing Board, U.S. Department of Education. ACTION: Notice of opportunity for initial public comment prior to updating the Civics Assessment Framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). SUMMARY: The National Assessment Governing Board (Governing Board) is seeking initial public comment prior to updating the Civics Assessment Framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). DATES: Comments must be received on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 27, 2026. ADDRESSES: Submit written comments via email to *nagb@ed.gov* with the subject line “NAEP Civics Framework.” FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharyn Rosenberg, National Assessment Governing Board, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202, telephone:
(202)245-6249, email: *Sharyn.Rosenberg@ed.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Governing Board is responsible for developing and updating NAEP frameworks, which guide the content of NAEP assessments. Section 302(e)(1)(c) of Public Law 107-279 specifies that the Governing Board determines the content to be assessed for each NAEP Assessment. Each NAEP subject area assessment is guided by a framework that defines the scope of the domain to be measured by delineating the knowledge and skills to be tested at each grade and subject, the format of the assessment, and the achievement level descriptions—guiding assessments that are valid, reliable, and reflective of widely accepted professional standards. In preparation for a potential update, the Board is initiating a preliminary review of the current NAEP Civics Assessment Framework. This initial gathering of public comment is the first stage in a comprehensive multi-year process that, if the Board decides framework revisions are needed, will later involve multiple iterations of stakeholder feedback and an expert panel to guide the development of assessment questions and recommendations for contextual questionnaires administered to students, teachers, and schools. Individuals and organizations are invited to provide written comments and recommendations relative to the current framework. Comments should specifically address three questions: • Does the NAEP Civics Assessment Framework need to be updated? • If the framework needs to be updated, why is a revision needed? • What should a revision to the framework include? Your name and affiliation may be shared and discussed publicly with your comments in upcoming Governing Board meetings and materials unless you indicate that your comments can only be shared without attribution. If the Governing Board decides that an update is needed, the charge to launch the revision process for the NAEP Civics Framework is anticipated to be adopted at the May 2026 quarterly Board meeting. Each NAEP framework development and update process considers a wide set of factors, including but not limited to reviews of recent research on teaching and learning, changes in state and local standards and assessments, and the latest perspectives on the nation's future needs and desirable levels of achievement. Resources NAEP Civics Framework NAEP Civics Specifications Board Policy on Assessment Framework Development *Electronic Access to this Document:* The official version of this document is the document published in the **Federal Register** . Internet access to the official edition of the **Federal Register** and the Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System at: *www.gpo.gov/fdsys.* At this site you can view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the **Federal Register** , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the Adobe website. You may also access documents of the Department published in the **Federal Register** by using the article search feature at: *www.federalregister.gov.* Specifically, through the advanced search feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published by the Department. (Authority: Pub. L. 107-279, title III, section 301—National Assessment of Educational Progress Authorization Act (20 U.S.C. 9621).) Lesley Muldoon, Executive Director, National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB), U.S. Department of Education. [FR Doc. 2026-02980 Filed 2-12-26; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 107-279
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of opportunity for initial public comment prior to updating the Civics Assessment Framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107-279
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.