Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2025-10-17 · United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; withdrawal

482 words·~2 min read·/register/2025/10/17/2025-19587·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce
Action: Proposed rule; withdrawal
Citation: FR Doc. 2025-19587 · RIN 0651-AD72 · Docket No. PTO-P-2023-0048 · 37 CFR 42

Summary

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO or Office) is withdrawing the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register on April 19, 2024, to revise the rules of practice for inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that the Director and, by delegation, the PTAB use in exercising discretion to institute IPRs and PGRs.

Dates

The proposed rule published in the Federal Register at 89 FR 28693 on April 19, 2024, is withdrawn as of October 17, 2025.

Supplementary Information

This Action withdraws a proposed rule published in the Federal Register on April 19, 2024 (89 FR 28693), to revise the rules of practice for IPR and PGR proceedings before the PTAB that the Director and, by delegation, the PTAB use in exercising discretion to institute IPRs and PGRs. The proposed rule modified and built on existing PTAB precedent and guidance concerning serial petitions, parallel petitions, and petitions implicating the same or substantially the same art or arguments previously presented to the Office. The proposed rule also provided a separate briefing process for discretionary institution arguments and aligned the procedures before and after institution regarding settlement agreements and termination. The proposed rule's comment period was open from April 19, 2024 to June 18, 2024. Reason for Withdrawal During the proposed rule's 60-day comment period, the USPTO received more than 3,900 submissions from a variety of stakeholders, including both supporting and opposing comments for the proposed rule. The comments are publicly available at the Federal eRulemaking Portal at . Of the comments received concerning the proposed rule, 110 comments were unique. The USPTO is withdrawing the rulemaking at this time to evaluate future actions in light of the administration's current priorities. Despite the decision not to move forward with the proposed rule at this time, the USPTO appreciates the thoughtful perspectives that commenters raised. The USPTO welcomes continued stakeholder feedback as it evaluates future actions. Conclusion The proposed rule to amend the rules of practice for IPR and PGR proceedings before the PTAB that the Director and, by delegation, the PTAB use in exercising discretion to institute IPRs and PGRs, published in the Federal Register on April 19, 2024 (89 FR 28693), is hereby withdrawn. John A. Squires, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [FR Doc. 2025-19587 Filed 10-16-25; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 37 CFR 42
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; withdrawal
Cite37 CFR 42
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.