Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2025-08-12 · Office of the Secretary, HHS · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice

473 words·~2 min read·/register/2025/08/12/2025-15283·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of the Secretary, HHS
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 2025-15283

Summary

A finding of research misconduct has been made against Ryan Evanoff (Respondent), former Scientific Assistant, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University. Respondent engaged in research misconduct under 42 CFR part 93 in research funded by the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS), specifically National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R21 AI126304. An administrative action, specifically debarment for a period of three (3) years, was implemented and is detailed below.

Supplementary Information

Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and the Suspension and Debarment Official (SDO) have taken final action in the following case: Ryan Evanoff, Washington State University (WSU): Based on the preponderance of the evidence from the WSU investigation and obtained by ORI in its oversight review, ORI found that Mr. Evanoff, former Scientific Assistant, Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, WSU, engaged in research misconduct under 42 CFR part 93 in research funded by PHS, specifically NIAID, NIH, grant R21 AI126304. ORI found by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent intentionally and knowingly falsified and/or fabricated the following DNA sequences reported in research records, each of which purports to include data from a different sequencing reaction: pC-293_pcDNAF_CZ3082_1.seq, pC-293_pcDNAR_CZ3083_2.seq, pQ-293_pQEfPR_CZ3084_3.seq, pQ-293_pQErev_CZ3085_4.seq, pQ-CD81_pQEfPR_CZ3086_1.seq, and pQ-CD81_pQErev_CZ3087_2.seq. Based on the information in the administrative record, the HHS SDO proposed debarment under 2 CFR 180.800(b)(1)—“Violation of the terms of a public agreement or transaction so serious as to affect the integrity of a Federal agency program, such as willful failure to perform in accordance with the terms of one or more public agreements or transactions;” and 2 CFR 180.800(d)—“Any other cause that is so serious or compelling in nature that it affects your present responsibility” to protect the Federal Government's interest. HHS provided Respondent the opportunity to contest the proposed debarment under 42 CFR part 93 by requesting a hearing before an administrative law judge with the HHS Departmental Appeals Board or alternatively, in lieu of requesting a hearing, to contest under 2 CFR part 180. Respondent did not contest within the prescribed 30-day period. Accordingly, the following administrative action has been implemented: • For a period of three (3) years, beginning on June 16, 2025, Respondent is debarred from participating in “covered transactions” as defined in 42 CFR § 180.200 and procurement transactions covered under the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1). Dated: August 8, 2025. Sheila R. Garrity, Director, Office of Research Integrity, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health. [FR Doc. 2025-15283 Filed 8-11-25; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
3 references not yet in our index
  • 42 CFR 93
  • 2 CFR 180
  • 42 CFR 180.200
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice
Cite42 CFR 93
Cite2 CFR 180
Cite42 CFR 180.200
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.