Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2025-06-10 · Federal Communications Commission · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice and request for comments

1,190 words·~5 min read·/register/2025/06/10/2025-10470·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Communications Commission
Action: Notice and request for comments
Citation: FR Doc. 2025-10470 · OMB 3060-1306; FR ID 297448

Summary

As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the FCC seeks specific comment on how it might “further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.”

Dates

Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be submitted on or before July 10, 2025.

Supplementary Information

The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number. As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the FCC invited the general public and other Federal Agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the FCC seeks specific comment on how it might “further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.” OMB Control Number: 3060-1306. Title: Do Not Originate Requirements Voice Service Providers Report and Order. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities, and state, local, or tribal government. Number of Respondents: 6,493 respondents; 77,916 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 2 hours. Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. Statutory authority for these collections are contained in sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 202, 217, 227, 227b, 251(e), 303(r), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, 217, 227, 227b, 251(e), 303(r), and 403. Total Annual Burden: 155,832 hours. Total Annual Cost: No cost. Needs and Uses: This notice and request for comments seeks to revise an existing information collection as it pertains to the Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls Sixth Report and Order and Call Authentication Trust Anchor Fifth Report and Order (“Gateway Provider Report and Order”), FCC 22-37. These revisions stem from the Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls Eighth Report and Order (“Call Blocking Eighth Report and Order”), FCC 25-15. Unwanted and illegal robocalls have long been the Commission's top source of consumer complaints and one of the Commission's top consumer protection priorities. Foreign-originated robocalls represent a significant portion of illegal robocalls, and gateway providers serve as a critical choke-point for reducing the number of illegal robocalls received by American consumers. In the Gateway Provider Report and Order, the Commission took steps to prevent these foreign-originated illegal robocalls from reaching consumers and to help track these calls back to the source. Call Blocking Eighth Report and Order, FCC 25-15, paras. 9-14, 47 CFR 64.1200(o). A voice service provider must block any calls purporting to originate from a number on a reasonable do-not-originate list. A list so limited in scope that it leaves out obvious numbers that could be included with little effort may be deemed unreasonable. The do-not-originate list may include only: (i) Numbers for which the subscriber to which the number is assigned has requested that calls purporting to originate from that number be blocked because the number is used for inbound calls only; (ii) North American Numbering Plan numbers that are not valid; (iii) Valid North American Numbering Plan Numbers that are not allocated to a provider by the North American Numbering Plan Administrator; and (iv) Valid North American Numbering Plan numbers that are allocated to a provider by the North American Numbering Plan Administrator, but are unused, so long as the provider blocking the calls is the allocatee of the number and confirms that the number is unused or has obtained verification from the allocatee that the number is unused at the time of blocking. The modified information collection for which OMB approval is sought comes from the revisions in the Eighth Call Blocking Report and Order (Call Blocking Eighth Report and Order at paras. 9-14) to the requirement originally adopted in the Gateway Provider Report and Order (Gateway Provider Order. at paras. 87-91). The categories of numbers that may be included on the reasonable DNO list are the same categories of numbers for which the Commission first authorized blocking in 2017 (Gateway Provider Order. at paras. 87-88; Call Blocking Eighth Report and Order at paras. 9-14), and did not change in the Eighth Call Blocking Report and Order. There is no valid reason for a caller to originate a call from these numbers calls purporting to originate from these numbers are highly likely to be illegal. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2025-10470 Filed 6-9-25; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
3 references not yet in our index
  • 44 USC 3501-3520
  • Pub. L. 107-198
  • 47 CFR 64.1200(o)
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice and request for comments
Cite44 USC 3501-3520
Pub. L.Pub. L. 107-198
Cite47 CFR 64.1200(o)
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.