Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2024-12-12 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

5,185 words·~24 min read·/register/2024/12/12/2024-29151

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-101839; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2024-076] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Certain Fees Based on the Rate of Inflation December 6, 2024 Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”), 1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, 2 notice is hereby given that on November 26, 2024, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's fees based on the rate of inflation. While these amendments are effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated the proposed amendments to be operative on January 1, 2025. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at *https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules,* at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adjust market data fees for inflation, to be operative on January 1, 2025. 3 3 This proposal was initially filed on November 12, 2024, as SR-Nasdaq-2024-069. On November 26, 2024, SR-Nasdaq-2024, SR-Nasdaq-2024-069 was withdrawn and replaced with the instant filing to provide certain additional information. Many Nasdaq market data fees have not changed for years, some for over 15.
As such, the fees have fallen substantially in real terms. The Exchange proposes to restore fees to the real amount intended in the original filings in a one-time inflationary adjustment. This adjustment will become operative in three parts: 45 percent in 2025; 30 percent in 2026; and the final 25 percent in 2027. The Exchange believes that it is necessary to spread the impact of this one-time adjustment for past inflation to prevent any undue impact that execution in a single tranche may have on our customers. 4 4 This proposal will adjust for inflation up to August 2024.
Depending on inflation thereafter, further adjustments may, or may not, be necessary. The proposed fee increases will apply to ten product families within Nasdaq:
(i)Distributor Fees;
(ii)Short Interest;
(iii)Depth of Book;
(iv)Distribution Models;
(v)FilterView;
(vi)Nasdaq Last Sale;
(vii)Nasdaq Share Volume;
(viii)Nasdaq Basic;
(ix)Daily Short Volume; and
(x)MatchView. A detailed list of fee adjustments is set forth below. The Exchange is not proposing to adjust fees for non-professional usage, administrative fees, extranet fees, or certain categories of Non-Display usage. The Exchange plans to use this inflationary adjustment to support continued investment in innovative, high-quality data products. Investments in Nasdaq Data Products Nasdaq has continuously invested in its products in the period after the current fees were first instituted to accommodate the increasing amount of information processed and the changes in technology over time. It is reasonable and consistent with the Act for the Exchange to recoup its investments, at least in part, by adjusting its fees. Continuing to operate at fees frozen in time impacts the Exchange's ability to enhance its offerings and the interests of market participants and investors. These investments have been necessary in part because of significant increases in the amount of information processed. The following message rate metrics for Nasdaq Basic illustrate this increase in throughput: • *Peak Rate by Millisecond:* up approximately 141% • *Average Rate per Millisecond:* up approximately 89% • *Peak Rate per Second:* up approximately 25% • *Average Rate per Second:* up approximately 23% • *Peak Total Messages:* up approximately 209% • *Average Total Messages:* up approximately 121% • *Average Daily Volume:* up approximately 82% • *Maximum Message Count:* up approximately 209% With this increase in message traffic, the Exchange expended significant resources to improve its market data products to meet customer expectations, including continued investment in all aspects of the technology ecosystem ( *e.g.,* software, hardware, and network). During the period between 2018 and 2023, advancements in system performance as measured by latency not only accommodated the high message traffic volumes but stayed well ahead of it. The following latency metrics 5 illustrate the increase in message processing speed, despite the significant message traffic growth: 5 These measurements compare the time difference between events on the matching engine and the time these events are published. • Median: down approximately 22% • Average: down approximately 28% • Max: down approximately 29% The Exchange continues to invest in enhancing its technology for the benefit and often at the behest of its customers. Yet the Exchange has not adjusted any of the fees included in this proposal for many years (as set forth below), to even partially offset the costs of maintaining and enhancing its market data offerings. Inflationary Index The fee increases the Exchange proposes are based on an industry-specific Producer Price Index (PPI), which is a tailored measure of inflation. 6 As a general matter, the Producer Price Index is a family of indexes that measures the average change over time in selling prices received by domestic producers of goods and services, measuring price change from the perspective of the seller. This contrasts with other metrics, such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI), that measure price change from the purchaser's perspective. 7 6 *See https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCU51825182#0.* 7 *See https://www.bls.gov/ppi/overview.htm.* About 10,000 PPIs for individual products and groups of products are tracked and released each month. 8 PPIs are available for the output of nearly all industries in the goods-producing sectors of the U.S. economy—mining, manufacturing, agriculture, fishing, and forestry—as well as natural gas, electricity, and construction, among others. The PPI program covers approximately 69 percent of the service sector's output, as measured by revenue reported in the 2017 Economic Census. 8 *See https://www.bls.gov/ppi/overview.htm.* For purposes of this proposal, the relevant industry-specific PPI is the Data Processing and Related Services PPI (“Data Processing PPI”), which is an industry net-output PPI that measures the average change in selling prices received by companies that provide data processing services. The Data Processing PPI was introduced in January 2002 by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(BLS)as part of an ongoing effort to expand Producer Price Index coverage of the services sector of the U.S. economy and is identified as NAICS—518210 in the North American Industry Classification System. 9 According to the BLS “[t]he primary output of NAICS 518210 is the provision of electronic data processing services. In the broadest sense, computer services companies help their customers efficiently use technology. The processing services market consists of vendors who use their own computer systems—often utilizing proprietary software—to process customers' transactions and data. Companies that offer processing services collect, organize, and store a customer's transactions and other data for record-keeping purposes. Price movements for the NAICS 518210 index are based on changes in the revenue received by companies that provide data processing services. Each month, companies provide net transaction prices for a specified service. The transaction is an actual contract selected by probability, where the price-determining characteristics are held constant while the service is repriced. The prices used in index calculation are the actual prices billed for the selected service contract.” 10 9 NAICS appears in table 5 of the PPI Detailed Report and is available at *https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/PCU518210518210.* 10 *See https://www.bls.gov/ppi/factsheets/producer-price-index-for-the-data-processing-and-related-servicesindustry-naics-518210.htm.* The Exchange believes the Data Processing PPI is an adequate measure to for adjusting fees for its proprietary market data products because the Exchange uses its “own computer systems” and “proprietary software,” *i.e.,* its own data center and proprietary matching engine software, respectively, to collect, organize, store and report customers' transactions in U.S. equity securities. 11 11 The Exchange notes that the Bureau of Labor Statistics uses a number of measures of inflation that may apply to Exchange market data. For example, there is also an inflation measure related to PPI industry data for data processing, hosting, and related services: Hosting, ASP, and other IT infrastructure provisioning services. This other measure has been used by other SROs in determining price changes and may provide an alternative point of reference. The Exchange furthermore notes that the Data Processing PPI is a stable metric with limited volatility, unlike other consumer-side inflation metrics. The Data Processing PPI has not experienced a greater than 2.16% increase for any one calendar year period since Data Processing PPI was introduced into the PPI in January 2002. The average calendar year change from January 2002 to December 2023 was 0.62%, with a cumulative increase of 15.67% over this 21-year period. The Exchange notes that other exchanges have filed for increases in certain fees, based in part on the rate of inflation. 12 12 *See, e.g.,* Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 34-100004 (April 22, 2024), 89 FR 32465 (April 26, 2024) (SR-CboeBYX-2024-012); and 34-100398 (June 21, 2024), 89 FR 53676 (June 27, 2024) (SR-BOX-2024-16); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 100994 (September 10, 2024), 89 FR 75612 (September 16, 2024) (SR-NYSEARCA-2024-79). Calculation and Proposed Fee Changes The proposed inflationary adjustments are based on a comparison of the Data Processing PPI index on the last date that the relevant fee was adjusted with the level of the Data Processing PPI index on August 1, 2024. For example, for a fee that was last changed on September 1, 2010, the Exchange divided the difference between the Data Processing PPI index on August 2024 (116.022) and the Data Processing PPI index in September 2010 (101.7) by the Data Processing PPI index in September 2010 (101.7), to calculate a total inflationary adjustment of 14 percent to obtain the percentage increase. That percentage increase was then applied to the prior fee to determine the proposed fee, and then rounding the result. 13 This calculation was repeated for each market data fee. 13 The Exchange rounded fees as follows: fee values over $999.99 were rounded to the nearest $10; fees between $99.99 and $999.99 were rounded to the nearest dollar; fees between $9.99 and $99.99 were rounded to the nearest $0.50; fees less than $9.99 were rounded to the nearest $0.10. Where rounding would have caused the proposed fee to exceed the rate of inflation, the Exchange rounded downward. As noted above, the Exchange proposes to adjust fees through a one-time inflationary adjustment to be executed in three tranches: one in 2025 that will cover 45 percent of the adjustment, another in 2026 to cover an additional 30 percent, and a final tranche in 2027 for the final 25 percent of the adjustment. Table 1 below shows the proposed changes for 2025, 2026 and 2027, the date of the last fee change, and the overall adjustment: Table 1—Proposed Inflationary Adjustment Product Current 2025 2026 2027 Last change Overall percent change 14 Market Data Distributor Fees Direct Access Fee (Nasdaq) $2,000 $2,125 $2,224 $2,281 15 9/1/2010 14.1 Direct Access Fee (Non-Nasdaq) 1,000 1,065 1,116 1,141 16 9/1/2010 14.1 Internal Distributor Fee (Nasdaq) 1,000 1,070 1,125 1,162 17 7/1/2006 16.2 Internal Distributor Fee (Non-Nasdaq) 500 540 565 581 18 7/1/2006 16.2 External Distributor Fee (Nasdaq) 2,500 2,680 2,820 2,906 19 7/1/2006 16.2 External Distributor Fee (Non-Nasdaq) 1,250 1,340 1,410 1,453 20 7/1/2006 16.2 Short Interest Report Access Fee 500 520 535 543 21 7/1/2017 22 8.6 Internal Distribution 1,000 1,040 1,070 1,087 23 7/1/2017 8.7 External Distribution (1-499 Subscribers) 2,500 2,600 2,680 2,718 24 7/1/2017 8.7 External Distribution (500-9,999 Subscribers) 5,000 5,200 5,350 5,437 25 7/1/2017 8.7 External Distribution (10,000+ Subscribers) 7,500 7,800 8,030 8,155 26 7/1/2017 8.7 External Distribution (Enterprise License) 1,500 1,560 1,610 1,631 27 7/1/2017 8.7 Depth-of-Book Data Level 2 Pro 76 80.50 84.00 86.00 28 3/1/2012 29 13.2 TotalView Pro 76 80.50 84.00 86.00 30 3/1/2012 31 13.2 Non-Display (1-39 Subscribers) 375 396 412 421 32 1/1/2016 33 12.3 Non-Display (40-99 Subscribers) 15,000 15,840 16,490 16,863 34 1/1/2016 12.4 Non-Display (100-249 Subscribers) 30,000 31,680 32,990 33,727 35 1/1/2016 12.4 Trading Platform Fee 5,000 5,270 5,480 5,600 36 12/1/2014 37 12.0 Trading Platform Fee Threshold 15,000 15,810 16,440 16,800 38 12/1/2014 39 12.0 Distribution Models Enhanced Display Solutions
(EDS)(1-399) 4,000 4,220 4,390 4,479 40 11/1/2014 12.0 Enhanced Display Solutions (400-999) 7,500 7,910 8,230 8,399 41 11/1/2014 12.0 Enhanced Display Solutions (1,000+) 15,000 15,810 16,440 16,798 42 11/1/2014 12.0 Enhanced Display Solutions Professional 80 84.50 88.00 89.50 43 11/1/2014 44 11.9 Enhanced Display Solutions Enterprise License 33,500 34,990 36,150 36,806 45 2/1/2017 9.9 Enterprise License Professional 76 80.50 84.00 86.00 46 3/1/2012 47 13.2 Managed Data Solution per Distributor 2,500 2,640 2,750 2,810 48 1/1/2016 12.4 Managed Data Solution per Professional 375 396 412 421 49 1/1/2016 50 12.3 FPGA Internal 25,000 26,570 27,790 28,490 51 5/1/2012 14.0 FPGA External 2,500 2,660 2,780 2,849 52 5/1/2012 14.0 FGPA Internal and External 27,500 29,230 30,570 31,339 53 5/1/2012 14.0 Managed Data Solution Administration Fee first Subscriber 5,000 5,280 5,500 5,621 54 1/1/2016 12.4 Managed Data Solution Administration Fee additional Subscribers 750 792 825 843 55 1/1/2016 12.4 FilterView Service FilterView 750 780 803 815 56 12/1/2017 8.7 Nasdaq Last Sale
(NLS)NLS per Subscriber (Nasdaq—Specialized Use) 13 13.50 14.10 14.50 57 1/1/2014 58 11.5 NLS per Subscriber (non-Nasdaq—Specialized Use) 13 59 13.80 14.40 14.50 60 1/1/2014 61 11.5 NLS Distributor 1,500 1,600 1,680 1,724 62 7/1/2008 63 14.9 NLS Distributor (Specialized Use) 2,000 2,080 2,140 2,170 64 1/1/2018 65 8.5 Nasdaq Share Volume Service Access Fee 2,500 2,680 2,820 2,897 66 2/1/2007 15.9 Nasdaq Basic Subscriber Fee (Nasdaq) 13 13.50 14.10 14.50 67 1/1/2014 68 11.5 Subscriber Fee
(NYSE)6.50 6.90 7.20 7.25 69 1/1/2014 70 11.5 Subscriber Fee (Other) 6.50 6.90 7.20 7.25 71 1/1/2014 72 11.5 Distributor Fee (Internal) 1,500 1,600 1,680 1,723 73 1/1/2009 14.9 Distributor Fee (External) 2,000 2,080 2,140 2,170 74 1/1/2018 75 8.5 Nasdaq Daily Short Volume and Monthly Short Sale Transaction Files Internal Distribution 750 783 809 824 76 1/1/2017 9.9 External Distribution 1,250 1,300 1,340 1,373 77 1/1/2017 78 9.8 Nasdaq MatchView Feed One Server 5,000 5,310 5,550 5,687 79 10/1/2011 13.7 Two or more Servers 10,000 10,620 11,100 11,374 80 10/1/2011 13.7 2. *Statutory Basis* The Exchange believes that its proposal to change fees is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act, 81 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act, 82 in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. 14 The overall percentage change is determined by the Data Processing PPI index, as discussed above. In a few instances, the overall percentage change is below the Data Processing PPI index due to rounding. Such instances are footnoted below. 15 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62907 (September 14, 2010), 75 FR 57324 (September 20, 2010) (SR-Nasdaq-2010-110). 16 *See id.* 17 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54179 (July 20, 2006), 71 FR 42428 (July 26, 2006) (SR-Nasdaq-2006-013). 18 *See id.* 19 *See id.* 20 *See id.* 21 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81256 (July 28, 2017), 82 FR 36168 (August 3, 2017) (SR-Nasdaq-2017-077). 22 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 8.7%. The actual change is 8.6% due to rounding of the fee. 23 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81256 (July 28, 2017), 82 FR 36168 (August 3, 2017) (SR-Nasdaq-2017-077). 24 *See id.* 25 *See id.* 26 *See id.* 27 *See id.* 28 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66740 (April 5, 2012), 77 FR 21609 (April 10, 2012) (SR-Nasdaq-2012-042). 29 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 13.6%. The actual change is 13.2% due to rounding of the fee. 30 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66740 (April 5, 2012), 77 FR 21609 (April 10, 2012) (SR-Nasdaq-2012-042). 31 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 13.6%. The actual change is 13.2% due to rounding of the fee. 32 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76779 (December 28, 2015), 81 FR 131 (January 4, 2016) (SR-Nasdaq-2015-157). 33 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 12.4%. The actual change is 12.3% due to rounding of the fee. 34 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76779 (December 28, 2015), 81 FR 131 (January 4, 2016) (SR-Nasdaq-2015-157). 35 *See id.* 36 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73978 (January 2, 2015), 80 FR 1057 (January 8, 2015) (SR-Nasdaq-2014-125). 37 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 12.1%. The actual change is 12.0% due to rounding of the fee. 38 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73978 (January 2, 2015), 80 FR 1057 (January 8, 2015) (SR-Nasdaq-2014-125). 39 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 12.1%. The actual change is 12.0% due to rounding of the fee. 40 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73807 (December 10, 2014), 79 FR 74784 (December 16, 2014) (SR-Nasdaq-2014-117). 41 *See id.* 42 *See id.* 43 *See id.* 44 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 12.0%. The actual change is 11.9% due to rounding of the fee. 45 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80015 (February 10, 2017), 82 FR 10944 (February 16, 2017) (SR-Nasdaq-2017-007). 46 *See id.* 47 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 13.6%. The actual change is 13.2% due to rounding of the fee. 48 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76797 (December 30, 2015), 81 FR 544 (January 6, 2016) (SR-Nasdaq-2015-158). 49 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76779 (December 28, 2015), 81 FR 131 (January 4, 2016) (SR-Nasdaq-2015-157) 50 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 12.4%. The actual change is 12.3% due to rounding of the fee. 51 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76297 (June 28, 2012), 77 FR 39752 (July 5, 2012) (SR-Nasdaq-2012-063). 52 *See id.* 53 *See id.* 54 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 76797 (December 30, 2015), 81 FR 544 (January 6, 2016) (SR-Nasdaq-2015-158). 55 *See id.* 56 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82467 (January 9, 2018), 83 FR 2261 (January 16, 2018) (SR-Nasdaq-2017-134). 57 Nasdaq Last Sale (specialized use case) was instituted in 2018. *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82723 (February 15, 2018), 83 FR 7812 (February 22, 2018) (SR-Nasdaq-2018-010). At that time, fees were set to be the equivalent of Nasdaq Basic fees set in 2014. *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71507 (February 7, 2014), 79 FR 8763 (February 13, 2014) (SR-Nasdaq-2014-011). In order to ensure that these fees remained aligned as intended by the 2018 filing, we are using the 2014 date, when the Nasdaq Basic fees were first set, to calculate the inflationary adjustment. 58 Fees for NLS (Specialized Use Case) were designed to be equivalent to Nasdaq Basic Fees. The PPI adjustment for Nasdaq Basic is 12.3%. The fee adjustment for NLS Specialized Use Case is 11.5%. 59 The fees for NLS (non-Nasdaq—Specialized Use Case for 2025, 2026 and 2027 are being adjusted to remain equivalent to the Subscriber fees for Nasdaq Basic. *See* Equity 7, Section 147(a)(1). As discussed in note 49 below, the fees for NLS Specialized Use Case were intended to be the same as the fees for Nasdaq Basic. *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82723 (February 15, 2018), 83 FR 7812 (February 22, 2018) (SR-Nasdaq-2018-010). 60 Nasdaq Last Sale (specialized use case) was instituted in 2018. *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82723 (February 15, 2018), 83 FR 7812 (February 22, 2018) (SR-Nasdaq-2018-010). At that time, fees were set to be the equivalent of Nasdaq Basic fees set in 2014. *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71507 (February 7, 2014), 79 FR 8763 (February 13, 2014) (SR-Nasdaq-2014-011). In order to ensure that these fees remained aligned as intended by the 2018 filing, we are using the 2014 date, when the Nasdaq Basic fees were first set, to calculate the inflationary adjustment. 61 Fees for NLS (Specialized Use Case) were designed to be equivalent to Nasdaq Basic Fees. The PPI adjustment for Nasdaq Basic is 12.3%. The fee adjustment for NLS Specialized Use Case is 11.5%. 62 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55255 (February 8, 2007), 72 FR 7100 (February 14, 2007) (SR-Nasdaq-2006-060). 63 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 15.0%. The actual change is 14.9% due to rounding of the fee. 64 As noted above, the Nasdaq Last Sale (specialized use case) was instituted in 2018. *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82723 (February 15, 2018), 83 FR 7812 (February 22, 2018) (SR-Nasdaq-2018-010). At that time, fees were set to be the equivalent of Nasdaq Basic fees. The Nasdaq Basic external distributor fee was set in January of 2018. *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82541 (January 19, 2018), 83 FR 3790 (January 26, 2018) (SR-Nasdaq-2018-004). To maintain equivalence of NLS (specialized use case) fees and Nasdaq Basic, we used the 2018 date for the inflationary adjustment. 65 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 8.6%. The actual change is 8.5% due to rounding of the fee. 66 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55444 (March 12, 2007), 72 FR 12648 (March 16, 2007) (SR-Nasdaq-2007-006). 67 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71507 (February 7, 2014), 79 FR 8763 (February 13, 2014) (SR-Nasdaq-2014-011). 68 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 12.3%. The actual change is 11.5% due to rounding of the fee. 69 *See id.* 70 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 12.3%. The actual change is 11.5% due to rounding of the fee. 71 *See id.* 72 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 12.3%. The actual change is 11.5% due to rounding of the fee. 73 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59244 (January 13, 2009), 74 FR 4065 (January 22, 2009) (SR-Nasdaq-2008-102). 74 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82541 (January 19, 2018), 83 FR 3790 (January 26, 2018) (SR-Nasdaq-2018-004). 75 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 8.7%. The actual change is 8.5% due to rounding of the fee. 76 *See* Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79617 (December 20, 2016), 81 FR 95213 (December 27, 2016) (SR-Nasdaq-2016-168). 77 *See id.* 78 The change as calculated by the Data Processing PPI index is 9.9%. The actual change is 9.8% due to rounding of the fee. 79 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65525 (October 11, 2011), 76 FR 64158 (October 17, 2011) (SR-Nasdaq-2011-139). 80 *See id.* 81 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 82 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). This belief is based on two factors. First, the current fees do not properly reflect the quality of the services and products, as fees for the services and products in question have been static in nominal terms, and therefore falling in real terms due to inflation. Second, the Exchange believes that investments made in enhancing the capacity of Exchange systems have increased the performance of the services and products notwithstanding fees having remained static in nominal terms. Equitable Allocation of Reasonable Dues, Fees and Other Charges The proposed changes are an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges because, as noted above, the Exchange has not increased any of the fees included in the proposal since the dates indicated in Table 1. In the years following the last fee increase, the Exchange has made significant investments in upgrades to Exchange systems and enhancing the quality of its services as measured by, among other things, increased throughput. As such, Exchange customers have benefitted while the Exchange's ability to recoup its investments has been hampered, and Exchange fees have fallen in real terms during the relevant period. Between 2018 and 2023, for example, the overall inflation rate was an average of 3.93% per year, producing a cumulative inflation rate of 21.28%. 83 Using the more targeted inflation number of Data Processing PPI, the cumulative inflation rate was 8.07%. 84 The Exchange believes the Data Processing PPI is a reasonable metric for this fee increase because it is targeted to producer-side increases in the data processing industry, which, based on the definition adopted by BLS, would include the Exchange's market data products. Notwithstanding this inflation, the Exchange has not increased its fees for the subject services for the period of time indicated in Table 1, and therefore the proposed fee changes represent a reasonable increase from the current fees. 83 *See https://www.officialdata.org/us/inflation/2019?endYear=2023&amount=1* . 84 *See https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/PCU518210518210.* The Exchange believes the proposed fee increase is reasonable in light of the Exchange's continued expenditure in maintaining a robust technology ecosystem. The Exchange continues to invest in maintaining and enhancing its market data products for the benefit and often at the behest of its customers and global investors. Such enhancements include refreshing all aspects of the technology ecosystem including software, hardware, and network while introducing new and innovative products. The goal of these enhancements, among other things, is to provide faster and more consistent market data products. The Exchange continues to expend resources to innovate and modernize technology so that it may benefit its members in offering its market data products. The Proposal Does Not Permit Unfair Discrimination The proposed fee increases are not unfairly discriminatory because they would apply to all data recipients that choose to purchase the market data products identified above. Any person that chooses to purchase any of these products would be subject to the same fee schedule, regardless of what type of business they operate or the use they plan to make of the data feed. Additionally, the fee increase would be applied uniformly to subscribers without regard to Exchange membership status or the extent of any other business with the Exchange or affiliated entities. The proposed changes are also not unfairly discriminatory because the fees would be assessed uniformly across all market participants that purchase these products in the same manner they are today, and all products will remain available for purchase by all market participants. B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Intramarket Competition The proposed fees do not put any market participants at a relative disadvantage compared to other market participants. As noted above, the fee schedule would continue to apply to all customers of the market data products identified above in the same manner as it does today, albeit at inflation-adjusted rates for certain fees, and customers may choose whether to subscribe to the feed at all. The Exchange also believes that the level of the proposed fees neither favors nor penalizes any one or more categories of market participants in a manner that would impose an undue burden on competition. Intermarket Competition The proposed fees do not impose a burden on competition or on other Self Regulatory Organizations that is not necessary or appropriate. In determining the proposed fees, the Exchange utilized an objective and stable metric with limited volatility. Utilizing Data Processing PPI over a specified period of time is a reasonable means of recouping the Exchange's investment in maintaining and enhancing the market data products identified above. The Exchange believes utilizing Data Processing PPI, a tailored measure of inflation, to increase certain market data fees to recoup the Exchange's investment in maintaining and enhancing its market data products would not impose a burden on competition. C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. 85 85 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is:
(i)necessary or appropriate in the public interest;
(ii)for the protection of investors; or
(iii)otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission's internet comment form ( *https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ); or • Send an email to *rule-comments@sec.gov.* Please include file number SR-NASDAQ-2024-076 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2024-076. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website ( *https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml* ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-NASDAQ-2024-076 and should be submitted on or before January 2, 2025. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 86 86 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024-29151 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.