Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2024-12-12 · Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce · Notices

Notices. Rule; correction

409 words·~2 min read·/register/2024/12/12/2024-29091·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration 19 CFR Part 356 [Docket No. 241206-0314] RIN 0625-AB20 Procedures and Rules for Article 10.12 of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement; Correction AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Rule; correction. SUMMARY: On January 31, 2024, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) updated and made final an interim final rule that amended its regulations pertaining to the procedures and rules related to Article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with appropriate references to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which went into effect on July 1, 2020.
This rule is correcting language in the regulations which was erroneously duplicated. DATES: Effective December 12, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott D. McBride, Associate Deputy Chief Counsel, at
(202)482-6292 or Spencer Neff, Senior Attorney, at
(202)482-8184. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 31, 2024, the Department of Commerce published a final rule amending its regulations pertaining to the procedures and rules related to Article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with appropriate references to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which went into effect on July 1, 2020 (89 FR 6011). The final rule erroneously duplicated language in 19 CFR 356.8(b)(2) from § 356.8(b)(1). This amendment corrects § 356.8(b)(2). List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 356 Administrative practice and procedure, Antidumping, Business and industry, Confidential business information, Countervailing duties, Imports. Dated: December 6, 2024. Ryan Majerus, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Accordingly, 19 CFR part 356 is corrected by making the following correcting amendment: PART 356—PROCEDURES AND RULES FOR ARTICLE 10.12 OF THE UNITED STATES-MEXICO-CANADA AGREEMENT 1. The authority citation for part 356 continues to read as follows: Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1516a and 1677f(f), unless otherwise noted. 2. In § 356.8, revise paragraph (b)(2) to read as follows: § 356.8 Continued suspension of liquidation.
(b)* * *
(2)A participant in a binational panel review that was a party to the proceeding, as described in section 771(9)(A) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1677(9)(A)), may request continued suspension of liquidation of the merchandise which it manufactured, produced, exported, or imported and which is covered by the administrative determination under review by the panel. Foreign governments are not listed as interested parties who may request the continuation of suspension under 19 U.S.C. 1516a(g)(5)(C)(iii). [FR Doc. 2024-29091 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 19 CFR 356
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Rule; correction
Cite19 CFR 356
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.