Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2024-10-31 · Postal Regulatory Commission · Notices

Notices. Notice

288 words·~1 min read·/register/2024/10/31/2024-25326·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. RM2024-9; Order No. 7817] RIN 3211-AA39 Service Performance Measurement Systems for Market Dominant Products AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: This document acknowledges that the Commission will be conducting one or more off-the-record technical conferences to attain information that the Commission requires to effectively review the Postal Service's Service Performance Measurement
(SPM)system. DATES: *Technical Conference:* January 15, 2025, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern Time, Virtual. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Docket No. RM2024-9 was initiated by the Commission to review the accuracy, reliability, and representativeness of the Postal Service's SPM system. SPM produces composite service performance results that are generated using several different data sources and data processing methods. The service performance results produced by SPM are an amalgamation of granular and siloed evaluations of performance for the individual segments of mail collection (First Mile), mail processing (Processing Duration), and mail delivery (Last Mile). Given recent changes in operations and mail mix, the Commission has concerns about the continued validity of the design and implementation of each of these three systems, as well as how the systems function collectively as a whole. Commission Information Request No. 3 sought to obtain, *inter alia,* the programming code associated with SPM, as well as a real-world example of the relevant SPM calculations being performed. The Postal Service moved for reconsideration, arguing that providing the information requested would be burdensome, would raise security concerns, and might not be technically feasible. The Postal Service requested a technical conference to discuss these issues, which the Commission found good cause to grant. By the Commission. Jennie L. Jbara, Primary Certifying Official. [FR Doc. 2024-25326 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.