Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2024-09-26 · Federal Election Commission · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notification of disposition of Petition for Rulemaking

747 words·~3 min read·/register/2024/09/26/2024-21979·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P 89 187 Thursday, September 26, 2024 Proposed Rules FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 11 CFR Part 112 [NOTICE 2024-23] Artificial Intelligence in Campaign Ads AGENCY: Federal Election Commission. ACTION: Notification of disposition of Petition for Rulemaking. SUMMARY: The Commission announces its disposition of a Petition for Rulemaking filed on July 13, 2023. The Petition asks the Commission to revise existing rules on the fraudulent misrepresentation of campaign authority to make clear that the related statutory prohibition applies to deliberately deceptive campaign ads using artificial intelligence (“AI”).
For the reasons described below, the Commission is not initiating a rulemaking at this time. DATES: September 26, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Robert M. Knop, Assistant General Counsel, or Ms. Jennifer Waldman, Attorney, 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20463,
(202)694-1650 or
(800)424-9530. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”) prohibits fraudulent misrepresentation in two specific ways. 1 First, the Act prohibits a candidate, his or her employee or agent, or an organization under the candidate's control, from purporting to speak, write, or act for another candidate or political party on a matter that is damaging to the other candidate or party. 2 Second, the Act prohibits any person from falsely representing that they are speaking, writing, or acting on behalf of a federal candidate or a political party for the purpose of soliciting contributions. 3 The Commission's regulation implementing 52 U.S.C. 30124 essentially mirrors the statutory text. 4 1 52 U.S.C. 30124. 2 52 U.S.C. 30124(a). *See also* Disclaimers, Fraudulent Solicitation, Civil Penalties, and Personal Use of Campaign Funds, 67 FR 76962, 76968 (Dec. 13, 2002). The Commission has explained that “on a matter that is damaging” means “actions or spoken or written communications that are intended to suppress votes for the candidate or party who has been fraudulently misrepresented.” *Id.* at 76968-69. 3 52 U.S.C. 30124(b). 4 *See* 11 CFR 110.16. On July 13, 2023, Public Citizen submitted a Petition for Rulemaking (“Petition”) to the Commission, asking it to undertake a rulemaking “to clarify that the law against `fraudulent misrepresentation' (52 U.S.C. 30124) applies to deliberately deceptive AI-produced content in campaign communications.” 5 The Petition requested that the Commission initiate a rulemaking for the purpose of amending 11 CFR 110.16(a), requesting that the FEC promulgate a rule providing that “if candidates or their agents fraudulently misrepresent other candidates or political parties through deliberately false AI-generated content in campaign ads or other communications—absent clear and conspicuous disclosure in the communication itself that the content is generated by artificial intelligence and does not represent real events—then the restrictions and penalties of the law and the Code of Regulations are applicable.” 6 5 Petition at 1. 6 Petition at 5. On August 16, 2023, the Commission published a Notice of Availability seeking public comment on the Petition. 7 It received more than 2,000 comments in response, including from Members of Congress, political party committees, advocacy groups across the ideological spectrum, and individual citizens. Commenters held a range of views about the desirability of opening the rulemaking requested by Petitioner. 7 *See* Notice of Availability, 88 FR 55606 (Aug. 16, 2023). Whether or not to open a rulemaking in response to a petition is vested within the Commission's discretion. 8 Petitioner asks the Commission to apply an interpretation of 52 U.S.C. 30124 specifically for “AI-produced content in campaign communications.” 9 The statute, however, is technology neutral and applies on its face to all means of accomplishing the specified fraud, including AI-assisted media. 8 11 CFR 200.5 (“The Commission's decision on the petition for rulemaking may include, but will not be limited to, the following considerations—(a) The Commission's statutory authority;
(b)Policy considerations;
(c)The desirability of proceeding on a case-by-case basis;
(d)The necessity or desirability of a statutory revision;
(e)Available agency resources”). 9 Petition at 1. Accordingly, the Commission has decided not to initiate a rulemaking at this time and will instead proceed with any application of 52 U.S.C. 30124 to specific technologies on a case-by-case basis. Copies of the comments and the Petition for Rulemaking are available on the Commission's website, *http://www.fec.gov/fosers/* (REG 2023-02 Artificial Intelligence in Campaign Ads (2023)) and at the Commission's Public Records Office, 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20463, Monday through Friday between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Dated: September 20, 2024. On behalf of the Commission, Sean J. Cooksey, Chairman, Federal Election Commission. [FR Doc. 2024-21979 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 11 CFR 112
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notification of disposition of Petition for Rulemaking
Cite11 CFR 112
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.