Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2024-04-26 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; reopening of the comment period

1,867 words·~8 min read·/register/2024/04/26/2024-08950·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Action: Proposed rule; reopening of the comment period
Citation: FR Doc. 2024-08950 · RIN 0910-AI69 · Docket No. FDA-2022-N-1635 · 21 CFR 80

Summary

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is reopening the comment period for the proposed rule, “Color Additive Certification; Increase in Fees for Certification Services,” which published in the Federal Register of November 2, 2022. We are taking this action to add supporting information to the administrative record and to adjust the record to reflect the same cost and benefits figures that were published in the preliminary regulatory impact analysis. We are reopening the comment period for 30 days specifically to invite public comments on the new information being added to the administrative record.

Dates

FDA is reopening the comment period on the proposed rule “Color Additive Certification; Increase in Fees for Certification Services,” which published in the Federal Register on November 2, 2022 (87 FR 66116). Either electronic or written comments must be submitted by May 28, 2024.

Supplementary Information

In the Federal Register of November 2, 2022 (87 FR 66116), FDA published a proposed rule to amend the color additive regulations to increase the fee for certification services. The change in fees would allow FDA to continue to maintain an adequate color certification program as required by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The fees are intended to recover the full costs of operation of FDA's color certification program. We originally gave interested persons until January 3, 2023, to provide comments on the proposed rule. On January 24, 2023, in response to a stakeholder request, we reopened the comment period for an additional 45 days to allow interested parties more time to collect, analyze, and incorporate data and submit comments to the proposed rule. Subsequently, we determined that additional supporting information should be included in the administrative record. Therefore, we are adding a Color Certification Fee Study (March 2024) to the administrative record that further explains the basis for the proposed rule. The fee study documents the need for increased fees and outlines the basis on which we developed the fee schedule in the proposed rule. We are adding the fee study to the administrative record and reopening the comment period for 30 days to provide the public an opportunity to comment on the document. Comments are invited, and will be considered, only to the extent they are focused on the information being newly added to the record. Additionally, for transparency, we are adjusting the Preliminary Economic Analysis of Impacts, in Section V. B. Summary of Costs and Benefits (87 FR 66116 at 66118). The proposed rule did not include the same estimates that were published in the Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis (PRIA) listed in the reference section (87 FR 66116 at 66119). The PRIA, entitled “Color Additive Certification; Increase in Fees for Certification Services” Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis, Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Analysis, and available at describes the estimates of the costs and benefits of the proposed rule. Consistent with the published PRIA, Section V.B. Summary of Costs and Benefits should read as follows: This proposed rule, if finalized, would amend existing color additive regulations by increasing fees for certification services. The fee schedule for color additive certification, as provided for in this proposed regulation, is designed to cover all the costs of operation of FDA's color certification program. This includes both the cost of specific tests required by the regulations and the general costs associated with the certification program, such as the costs of accounting, reviewing data, issuing certificates, conducting research, inspecting establishments, and purchasing and maintaining equipment. The fee for certification services of straight colors including lakes would increase from $0.35 per pound to $0.45 per pound, with the minimum fee increasing from $224 to $288. The fees for repacks of certified color additives and color additive mixtures would increase from $35 for 100 pounds or less to $45 for 100 pounds or less. The fee for repacks of certified color additives and color additive mixtures over 100 pounds, but not over 1,000 pounds would increase from $35 plus $0.06 for each pound over 100 pounds to $45 plus $0.08 for each pound over 100 pounds. The fee for repacks of certified color additives and color additive mixtures over 1,000 pounds would increase from $89 plus $0.02 for each pound over 1,000 pounds to $114 plus $0.03 for each pound over 1,000 pounds. The economic burdens of this proposed rule, if finalized, would accrue to color additive manufacturers. We estimate a one-time cost to read and understand the rule for all color additive manufacturers. The present value of this cost is approximately $2,307 at a 3 percent rate of discount, and $2,221 at a 7 percent rate of discount. The annualized value of these costs estimates is approximately $270 at a 3 percent discount rate and $316 at a 7 percent discount rate. Because the value of these impacts is small relative to manufacturer revenues, we assume that the supply of color additives would not be affected by this proposed rule. Consequently, we estimate no other impacts associated with this proposed rule. As noted in the preamble, the fees are intended to recover the full costs of operation of FDA's color certification program. Since 2005, the costs of the certification program significantly increased as a result of escalating staff payroll, rent and facility charges, as well as general operational expenses including purchasing and maintaining equipment. As the increase in fees is not associated with any change in the FDA certification program, no economic benefits are expected to result from the proposed rule. Similarly, the impact of the increase in certification fees on color additive manufacturers is considered a transfer, rather than an economic cost. Accordingly, we do not estimate economic benefits associated with this proposed rule, and the impact of the increase in color certification fees is estimated as an ongoing transfer from manufacturers of color additives to the federal government. Our estimates are summarized in Table 1, below. Table 1—Summary of Benefits, Costs, and Distributional Effects of Proposed Rule [Millions of 2020 dollars over 10-year time horizon] Category Primary estimate Low estimate High estimate Units Year dollars Discount rate (%) Period covered (years) Notes Benefits: Annualized 7 Monetized $/year 3 Annualized 7 Quantified 3 Qualitative Costs: Annualized $0.00032 2020 7 10 Monetized $/year $0.00027 2020 3 10 Annualized 7 Quantified 3 Qualitative Transfers: Federal $2.46 2020 7 10 Annualized $2.46 2020 3 10 Monetized $/year From/To From: Manufacturers of color additives To: Federal Government Other Annualized 7 Monetized $/year 3 From/To From: To: Effects: State, Local or Tribal Government: No effect. Small Business: The proposed rule, if finalized, would generate costs to small businesses, as well as transfers from small businesses to FDA that we treat as costs from the perspective of the small business. On average, these costs amount to approximately 0.2733% of annual average revenues of the small firms in the affected industry. Wages: No effect. Growth: No effect. Dated: April 22, 2024. Lauren K. Roth, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2024-08950 Filed 4-25-24; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 21 CFR 80
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; reopening of the comment period
Cite21 CFR 80
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.