Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2023-05-25 · DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

901 words·~4 min read·/register/2023/05/25/2023-11132·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. 22-11] Gary Gray d/b/a Complex; Decision and Order On November 22, 2021, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA or the Agency) issued an Order to Show Cause
(OSC)to Gary Gray d/b/a Complex (hereinafter, the Respondent) seeking to deny Respondent's application for a DEA Certificate of Registration to manufacture marihuana, Control No. W14063382E. OSC, at 1. After a hearing, the Chief Administrative Law Judge (Chief ALJ) issued his Recommended Rulings, Findings of Law, and Decision of the Administrative Law Judge (Recommended Decision or RD), which recommended Respondent's application for a manufacturing registration be denied because “the plain language of the controlling regulations compels the denial of the present application as a matter of law.” RD, at 2, 11. The Agency agrees with the Chief ALJ's recommendation, and, for the reasons explained below, denies Respondent's application as inconsistent with the public interest under 21 U.S.C. 823(a). 1 1 Effective December 2, 2022, the Medical Marijuana and Cannabidiol Research Expansion Act, Public Law 117-215, 136 Stat. 2257
(2022)(Marijuana Research Amendments or MRA), amended the Controlled Substances Act
(CSA)and other statutes; however, the relevant provision here, 21 U.S.C. 823(a), remained the same. I. Findings of Fact On July 30, 2014, Respondent filed an application with DEA to bulk manufacture Schedule I controlled substances. Government Exhibit
(GX)1. According to Respondent, he is seeking to obtain DEA registration as a bulk manufacturer of marihuana “so that he may cultivate, harvest, and package the particular strains of marihuana required for his research and product development purposes.” Resp Posthearing, at 4; Tr. 30. Respondent hopes to ultimately produce products that will treat Alzheimer's and other degenerative diseases. Tr. 30, 49. Respondent is a pharmacist and has possessed, and operated under, pharmacy controlled substance registrations, as well as having held multiple state pharmacy licenses for over 50 years. Tr. 58-61. It is undisputed, however, that Respondent does not currently hold any type of DEA controlled substance registration, and at the onset of the hearing, a certification of Respondent's lack of DEA registration as a schedule 1 researcher was admitted into the record without objection. Tr. 18; GX 1, at 2. II. Discussion The Controlled Substances Act
(CSA)states that the Agency shall register an applicant to manufacture controlled substances in schedule I or II if such registration is determined to be “consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971.” 21 U.S.C. 823(a). The CSA provides six factors DEA must consider in determining the public interest. *Id.* 21 CFR 1318.05, which implements the requirements of § 823(a) for marihuana growers and manufacturers, further provides that the Agency shall place “particular emphasis” on certain enumerated criteria in determining the public interest. In situations, such as here, where “an applicant seeks registration to grow cannabis for its own research or product development” one of the criteria of “particular emphasis” is that “the applicant *must possess* registration as a schedule I researcher with respect to marihuana under § 1301.31 of this chapter.” 21 CFR 1318.05(b)(3)(ii) (emphasis added). It is undisputed that Respondent does not possess a DEA schedule I researcher registration under § 1301.31. Tr. 19; Respondent's Exceptions, at 3. Accordingly, under the plain language of the regulation, Respondent does not meet the criteria to receive the manufacturer registration for which he has applied, and the Agency finds that granting his application for a registration would not be consistent with the public interest under § 823(a). 2 2 Respondent filed Exceptions to the Chief ALJ's Recommended Decision arguing that he is eligible for a manufacturer registration because he applied for the requisite researcher registration in June 2022 and that application is pending with DEA. Respondent's Exceptions, at 4. Respondent's argument is unpersuasive as the regulations clearly state that an applicant must *currently* possess a researcher registration, not just have submitted an application for one. (Respondent's application for a researcher registration is also not in the record under consideration for this matter as, based on a declaration from Respondent's counsel, it was submitted after the Chief ALJ had transferred the certified record for this matter to the DEA Administrator). Respondent requests, in the alternative, that any action on the instant application be stayed pending action on his application for registration as a schedule 1 researcher. *Id.* at 6-7. Respondent's request is denied. Respondent may submit a new application for a manufacturer registration and that application will be evaluated on its merits. Order Pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100(b) and the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C. 823(a), I hereby deny DEA registration application No. W14063382E submitted by Gary Gray d/b/a/Complex. This Order is effective June 26, 2023. Signing Authority This document of the Drug Enforcement Administration was signed on May 16, 2023, by Administrator Anne Milgram. That document with the original signature and date is maintained by DEA. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DEA Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as an official document of DEA. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the **Federal Register** . Heather Achbach, Federal Register Liaison Officer, Drug Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. 2023-11132 Filed 5-24-23; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 136 Stat. 2257
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Stat.136 Stat. 2257
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.