Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2023-05-04 · National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Commerce · Notices

Notices. Notice of information collection, request for comment

1,006 words·~5 min read·/register/2023/05/04/2023-09477·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-13-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for Review and Approval; Comment Request; iEdison System AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of information collection, request for comment. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment preceding submission of the collection to OMB. DATES: To ensure consideration, comments regarding this proposed information collection must be received on or before July 3, 2023. ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments by mail to Bureau Elizabeth Reinhart, Management Analyst, NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, or by email to *PRAcomments@doc.gov* ). Please reference OMB Control Number 0693-0090 in the subject line of your comments. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or specific questions related to collection activities should be directed to Bethany Loftin, Interagency and iEdison Specialist, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, 202-941-7750, *bethany.loftin@nist.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The Bayh-Dole Act (35 U.S.C. 18) and its implementing regulations (37 CFR 401) allow for recipients of federal research funding (Contractors) to retain ownership of inventions developed under federal funding agreements. In exchange, the government retains certain rights to the invention, including a world-wide right to use by or on behalf of the U.S. government. The law also requires the Contractor to obtain permission for certain actions and fulfill reporting requirements including: a. Initial reporting of invention. b. Decision to retain title to invention. c. Filing of patent protection. d. Evidence of government support clause within patents. e. Submission of a license confirming the government's rights. f. Notice if the Contractor is going to discontinue the pursuit or continuance of patent protection. g. Information related to the development and utilization of invention. h. Permission to assign to a third party; and i. Permission to waive domestic manufacturing requirements. This information is used for a variety of reasons. It allows the government to identify technologies to which the government has rights to use without additional payment or licensing. This acts as a time and cost-saving mechanism to avoid unnecessary negotiating and payment. It also provides data for calculation of return on investment
(ROI)from federal funding and identifies successful research programs. Thirdly, it allows the government the opportunity to timely protect inventions which the Contractor declines title or discontinues patent protection. Many agencies utilize the iEdison system, managed by NIST, to collect this information. Agencies that do not register with iEdison are required to collect this information independently. Historically, only NIH and DOE regularly requested that Contractors submit requests for reports on the development and utilization of an invention (utilization reports) within iEdison. However, there has been an increased interest across the government in the impact of federally funded research and resulting inventions as well as compliance with the Bayh-Dole requirements, especially as it relates to domestic manufacturing requirements. As a result, the interagency working group for Bayh-Dole decided that all agencies would begin to request this information, and the questions would be amended and expanded upon so that the agencies could get a clear picture of the commercialization plans for subject inventions, what the licensing landscape looked like, what products were resulting, and where those products were being manufactured. Another data point of particular interest across government relates to gender, and specifically how gender disparity may be present within the inventing and commercialization space. Collecting gender of the inventors within iEdison provides agencies previously unavailable data that they may use to conduct assessments under administrative policy guidance outlined in Executive Order 13985. NIST does not anticipate that the collection of this data will significantly affect the reporting burden. II. Method of Collection Information will be electronically collected through the online system iEdison. III. Data *OMB Control Number:* 0693-0090. *Form Number(s):* None. *Type of Review:* Regular submission, Revision. *Affected Public:* Business or other for-profit organizations; Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local, or Tribal government. *Estimated Number of Respondents:* 3,063. *Estimated Time per Response:* *Invention Records:* 6 hours. *Patent Records:* 3.5 hours. *Utilization Records:* 5.5 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:* *Invention Records:* 18,378 hours. *Patent Records:* 10,720 hours. *Utilization Records:* 16,847 hours. *Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public:* $0. *Respondent's Obligation:* Mandatory. *Legal Authority:* The Bayh-Dole Act (35 U.S.C. 18) and its implementing regulations (37 CFR 401). IV. Request for Comments We are soliciting public comments to permit the Department/Bureau to:
(a)Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is necessary for the proper functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility;
(b)Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the time and cost burden for this proposed collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
(c)Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d)Minimize the reporting burden on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Sheleen Dumas, Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Commerce Department. [FR Doc. 2023-09477 Filed 5-3-23; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
2 references not yet in our index
  • 35 USC 18
  • 37 CFR 401
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of information collection, request for comment
Cite35 USC 18
Cite37 CFR 401
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.