Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2023-02-22 · Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Final rule

1,465 words·~7 min read·/register/2023/02/22/2023-03147·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Action: Final rule
Citation: FR Doc. 2023-03147 · 40 CFR 300

Summary

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announces the deletion of one site and the partial deletion of two sites from the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL, created under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and the states, through their designated state agencies, have determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA have been completed. However, this deletion does not preclude future actions under Superfund.

Dates

The document is effective February 22, 2023.

Supplementary Information

The NPL, created under section 105 of CERCLA, as amended, is an appendix of the NCP. The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Partial deletion of sites is in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and are consistent with the Notice of Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed on the National Priorities List, 60 FR 55466, (November 1, 1995). The sites to be deleted are listed in Table 1, including docket information containing reference documents with the rationale and data principally relied upon by the EPA to determine that the Superfund response is complete. The NCP permits activities to occur at a deleted site, or that media or parcel of a partially deleted site, including operation and maintenance of the remedy, monitoring, and five-year reviews. These activities for the site are entered in Table 1 in this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section, if applicable, under Footnote such that; 1= site has continued operation and maintenance of the remedy, 2= site receives continued monitoring, and 3= site five-year reviews are conducted. As described in 40 CFR 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a site or portion of a site deleted from the NPL remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial action if future conditions warrant such actions. Table 1 Site name City/county, state Type Docket No. Footnote U.S. Finishing/Cone Mills Greenville, SC Partial EPA-HQ-OLEM-2022-0579 Wauconda Sand & Gravel Wauconda, IL Partial EPA-HQ-OLEM-2022-0319 1,2,3 River City Metal Finishing San Antonio, TX Full EPA-HQ-OLEM-2022-0527 Information concerning the sites to be deleted and partially deleted from the NPL, the proposed rule for the deletion and partial deletion of the sites, and information on receipt of public comment(s) and preparation of a Responsiveness Summary (if applicable) are included in Table 2. Table 2 Site name Date, proposed rule FR citation Public comment Responsiveness summary Full site deletion (full) or media/parcels/description for partial deletion U.S. Finishing/Cone Mills 8/17/2022 87 FR 50596 No No 70-acres of Operable Unit 1 Main Facility which includes soil, surface water, and sediment. Wauconda Sand & Gravel 8/17/2022 87 FR 50596 No No Approximately 76-acres of soil. River City Metal Finishing 8/17/2022 87 FR 50596 Yes Yes Full. For the sites proposed for deletion, the closing date for comments in the proposed rule was September 16, 2022. The EPA received two public comments on the River City Metal Finishing site in this final rule. EPA placed the comments in the docket specified in Table 1, on , and in the appropriate Regional Records Center listed in the ADDRESSES section. One public comment was not germane to the proposed rulemaking. The second commentor believes CERCLA gives no guarantee that harm will not be done to public health again in the future at the site. The commenter believes if a site is no longer considered to be a hazard, it should be noted that it was once classified as a priority and ranked lower overall on the NPL rather than deleted from the NPL. In response, no hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at the Site above levels that preclude unlimited use and unrestricted exposure. This means that under the current and future residential, commercial, and industrial land use scenarios, the site poses no unacceptable risks to human health and the environment. Thus, EPA concluded that no action is warranted under CERCLA, and the site can be deleted from the NPL. The deletion criteria for the Site have been met. A Responsiveness Summary was prepared and placed in the site deletion docket, EPA-HQ-OLEM-2022-0527 on , and in the appropriate Regional Records Centers listed in the ADDRESSES section. For all other sites not specified above, no adverse comments were received. EPA maintains the NPL as the list of sites that appear to present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or the environment. Deletion from the NPL does not preclude further remedial action. Whenever there is a significant release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system. Deletion of a site from the NPL does not affect responsible party liability in the unlikely event that future conditions warrant further actions. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations, Natural resources, Oil pollution, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water pollution control, Water supply. Larry Douchand, Office Director, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. For reasons set out in the preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 300 as follows: PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN 1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193. 2. In Appendix B to part 300 amend Table 1 by: a. Revising the entry for “IL”, “Wauconda Sand & Gravel”, “Wauconda”; b. Removing the entry for “TX”, “River City Metal Finishing”, “San Antonio”. The revision reads as follows: Appendix B to Part 300—National Priorities List Table 1—General Superfund Section State Site name City/county Notes (a) * * * * * * * IL Wauconda Sand & Gravel Wauconda P * * * * * * * * P = Sites with partial deletion(s). [FR Doc. 2023-03147 Filed 2-21-23; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
4 references not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 300
  • 40 CFR 300.425(e)
  • 40 CFR 300.425(e)(3)
  • 42 USC 9601-9657
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Final rule
Cite40 CFR 300
Cite40 CFR 300.425(e)
Cite40 CFR 300.425(e)(3)
Cite42 USC 9601-9657
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.