Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2023-01-17 · U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense · Notices

Notices. Final rule

570 words·~3 min read·/register/2023/01/17/2023-00538·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers 33 CFR Part 277 [COE-2020-0012] RIN 0710-AB35 Water Resources Policies and Authorities: Navigation Policy: Cost Apportionment of Bridge Alterations AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This final rule removes the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' part titled Water Resources Policies and Authorities: Navigation Policy: Cost Apportionment of Bridge Alterations.
Each removed section of this part is out-of-date and otherwise covers internal agency operations that have no public compliance component or adverse public impact. Therefore, this part can be removed from the CFR. DATES: This rule is effective on January 17, 2023. ADDRESSES: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ATTN: CECW-EC (Mr. Robert Bank), 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20314-1000. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy K. Frantz at
(202)761-0106 or by email at *Amy.K.Frantz@usace.army.mil.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule removes 33 CFR part 277, Water Resources Policies and Authorities: Navigation Policy: Cost Apportionment of Bridge Alterations. The rule was initially published in the **Federal Register** on May 30, 1979 (44 FR 31129). The regulation was promulgated to adapt Coast Guard procedures under the Truman-Hobbs Act in 33 U.S.C. 516 to Corps navigation project feasibility plan formulation, with regard to apportionment of costs between Bridge Owners and the Government, when the Government requires bridge alteration to avoid obstruction of navigation. The underlying Coast Guard procedures for bridge alteration cost apportionment at 33 CFR 116.50 were updated in 1995 (60 FR 20902) while the Corps' regulation was never subsequently amended. The calculations for the cost apportionment are the responsibility of the Coast Guard and the Corps uses the current Coast Guard calculations in planning formulations for new projects when they involve bridges falling under the Truman-Hobbs Act. The rule was published, at that time, in the **Federal Register** to aid public accessibility. The solicitation of public comment for this removal is unnecessary because the rule is out-of-date and otherwise covers internal agency operations that have no public compliance component or adverse public impact. Applicable guidance on bridge alteration cost apportionment is found in current Coast Guard procedures at 33 CFR 116.50, Apportionment of costs under the Truman-Hobbs Act. For current public accessibility purposes, the internal implementing process for the applicable guidance is in Engineer Regulation 1165-2-25, “Navigation Policy: Cost Apportionment of Bridge Alterations” (available at *https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerRegulations/ER_1165-2-25.pdf?ver=2013-09-08-233442-167* ). The agency policy is only applicable to field operating activities having Civil Works responsibilities and provides guidance specific to the Corps' policies and guidelines for the apportionment of bridge alteration costs required in connection with navigation improvements recommended in reports transmitted to the Chief of Engineers for approval or submitted to Congress for authorization. This rule removal is being conducted to reduce confusion for the public as well as for the Corps regarding the current policy which governs the Corps' cost apportionment of bridge alterations. Because the regulation does not place a burden on the public, its removal does not provide a reduction in public burden or costs. This rule is not significant under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review.” List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 277 Bridges, Coast Guard, Navigation (water). PART 277—[REMOVED] Accordingly, by the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301, 33 CFR part 277 is removed. Approved by: Michael L. Connor, Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works). [FR Doc. 2023-00538 Filed 1-13-23; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 33 CFR 277
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Final rule
Cite33 CFR 277
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.