Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2022-12-23 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Notices

Notices. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

491 words·~2 min read·/register/2022/12/23/2022-27959·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-96541/December 20, 2022] Order Scheduling Filing of Statements on Review; In the Matter of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. for an Order Granting the Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 2, To Establish a Corporate Bond New Issue Reference Data Service (File No. SR-FINRA-2019-008) On January 15, 2021, the Commission issued an order (“Approval Order”) approving a proposed rule change (“Proposal”) by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(“FINRA”) to establish a new issue reference data service for corporate bonds. 1 Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) filed a petition for review of the Approval Order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (“D.C. Circuit”), challenging the Commission's Approval Order. 1 *See* Exchange Act Release No. 90939 (Jan. 15, 2021), 86 FR 6922 (Jan. 25, 2021) (Order Setting Aside Action by Delegated Authority and Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 2, To Establish a Corporate Bond New Issue Reference Data Service).
The D.C. Circuit found that all but one of Bloomberg's arguments lacked merit. Specifically, the D.C. Circuit concluded that the Approval Order failed to sufficiently consider Bloomberg's “concerns about the costs that FINRA, as well as market participants, will incur in connection to the creation and maintenance of the data service.” 2 The D.C. Circuit remanded to the Commission for reconsideration of this issue, but did not vacate the Approval Order. 3 2 *Bloomberg L.P.* v. *SEC,* 45 F.4th 462, 466 (D.C.
Cir. 2022). 3 *Id.* at 478. The court stated that “on remand, `the Commission can redress its failure of explanation' by analyzing the costs FINRA will incur in building and maintaining its data service and how the costs of building the data service will be remunerated if the fee proposal is ultimately disapproved by the Commission.” 4 The D.C. Circuit's mandate, which was issued on October 11, 2022, returned the matter to the Commission for further proceedings. 5 4 *Id.* at 477. 5 Doc.
No. 1968395, Case No. 21-1088 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 11, 2022). Accordingly, to facilitate the Commission's further review of the Proposal, *it is ordered,* that by January 19, 2023, FINRA may submit any additional statements or information that it considers relevant to the Commission's analysis of the issue on remand, including the costs FINRA expects to incur in building and maintaining its data service and how the costs of building the data service would be remunerated if the fee proposal is ultimately disapproved by the Commission.
Furthermore, the Commission is providing other parties and persons 30 days to respond to any additional statements or information FINRA may submit. Accordingly, *it is ordered,* that by February 18, 2023, any party or other person may submit any additional statements or information such party or other person considers relevant to the issue on remand. By the Commission. Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2022-27959 Filed 12-22-22; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 45 F.4th 462
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.