Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2022-12-06 · Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT) · Notices

Notices. Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)

724 words·~3 min read·/register/2022/12/06/2022-26495

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Highway Administration Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in California; Statute of Limitations on Claims AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is issuing this notice to announce Caltrans' adoption of the Maritime Administration's (MARAD) Combined Final Environmental Impact Statement/Record of Decision and Final Section 4(f) Evaluation, (FEIS/ROD) for the Port of Long Beach (POLB or Port) Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility Project (Project).
The Final EIS and ROD for the Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility Project were approved by MARAD on April 7, 2022. MARAD's Notice of Availability for the Final EIS and ROD was published in the **Federal Register** on April 15, 2022. Under 49 U.S.C. 304a(b), MARAD issued a single Final EIS and ROD (USEPA, 2022). Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)did not apply to the action ( **Federal Register** , 2022). Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.3(b)(2), Caltrans was a cooperating agency on this project. Therefore, recirculation of the document is not necessary under Section 1506.3(c) of the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ)regulations. DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public of final agency actions subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking judicial review of the Federal agency actions on the highway project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before May 5, 2023. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of a claim provides a time period of less than 150 days for filing such claim, then that shorter time period still applies. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For Caltrans: For Caltrans District 7: Michael Enwedo, Branch Chief, Division of Environmental Planning, California Department of Transportation-District 7, 100 S Main Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Office Hours: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., Pacific Standard Time, Telephone:
(213)335-0060 or Email: *michael.enwedo@dot.ca.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Subsequent to MARAD's ROD issued for the entire Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility Project, pursuant to 40 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR)1505.2 and 23 CFR 771.127 Caltrans issued a ROD for the Pier B Street Freight Corridor Reconstruction Project on November 9th, 2022, which is a component of the Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility Project. Caltrans is a cooperating agency for the Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility Project. This ROD is solely for Caltrans approval of the Pier B Street Freight Corridor Reconstruction Project. The Pier B Street Freight Corridor Reconstruction Project scope includes the following: • *Pier B Street:* Realignment of Pier B St between Pico Av and Anaheim St and widening into two lanes in each direction to improve goods movement mobility and enhance pedestrian travel. The realignment of Pier B Street would require the reconstruction of two intersections, at Anaheim Way and Edison Avenue. • *9th Street Crossing:* The existing at-grade 9th Street railroad grade crossing would be closed. After the intersection with 9th street is closed, access to Interstate (I-) 710 would remain open at Pico Avenue, where the existing ramp at the 9th Street/Pico Avenue intersection is located. Access to Anaheim Street would be shifted to Anaheim Way and Farragut Avenue at the western end of Pier B Street. • *Removal of Shoemaker Ramps:* The Shoemaker ramps and approaches would be removed. The Shoemaker north approach and the 9th Street bridge north approach would be demolished. • *Pico Avenue:* Pico Avenue is located within a narrow corridor 1 between I-710 and several buildings, terminals, and ramps. Pico Avenue would be realigned to the west from Pier B St/I-710 ramps south to approximately Pier D Street to accommodate the addition of our railroad tracks. The existing at-grade crossing at Pico Avenue/Pier D Street would be closed. • *Sidewalk:* Construction of new sidewalk on the south side of Pier B St and along the west 7 side of Pico Ave. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply to this program.) *Authority:* 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1). Antonio Johnson, Director, Planning, Environment and Right of Way, Federal Highway Administration, California Division. [FR Doc. 2022-26495 Filed 12-5-22; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 4
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 40 CFR 1506.3(b)(2)
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
Cite40 CFR 1506.3(b)(2)
Cites 5Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.