Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2022-11-15 · Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department of Transportation (DOT) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Confirmation of withdrawn advance notice of proposed rulemaking

852 words·~4 min read·/register/2022/11/15/2022-24708·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), Department of Transportation (DOT)
Action: Confirmation of withdrawn advance notice of proposed rulemaking
Citation: FR Doc. 2022-24708 · Docket No. FMCSA-2022-0079 · 49 CFR 350

Summary

FMCSA confirms its May 1, 2017, decision to withdraw its April 27, 2016, advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) concerning the establishment of requirements for States to implement annual inspection programs for commercial motor vehicles (CMVs) designed or used to transport passengers (passenger-carrying CMVs). On November 15, 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) was enacted, directing FMCSA to solicit additional comment on the 2016 ANPRM. The Agency solicited additional comments for 30 days, ending June 9, 2022. After reviewing the additional public comments received, FMCSA has determined there is not enough data and information available to support moving forward with a rulemaking action.

Dates

FMCSA confirms the withdrawal of the ANPRM as of November 15, 2022.

Supplementary Information

Background On April 27, 2016, in accordance with section 32710 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, 815), FMCSA published in the Federal Register , an ANPRM titled “State Inspection Programs for Passenger-Carrier Vehicles” (Docket No. FMCSA-2014-0470, 81 FR 24769). The ANPRM announced that FMCSA was considering a requirement that States establish a program for annual inspections of passenger-carrying CMVs. FMCSA requested information from all interested parties that would enable the Agency to assess the risks associated with improperly maintained or improperly inspected passenger-carrying CMVs. The ANPRM also sought public comments concerning the effectiveness of the current FMCSA annual inspection standards, and data on the potential costs and benefits of a Federal requirement for each State to implement a mandatory inspection program. FMCSA inquired about how the Agency might incentivize States to adopt such programs. The comment period closed on June 27, 2016, and 22 comments were received, with a plurality (10 of 22) of commenters expressing general opposition to the mandatory State inspection requirement discussed in the ANPRM. After reviewing all the public comments, FMCSA determined there was not enough data and information available to support moving forward with a rulemaking action. As a result, on May 1, 2017, the Agency withdrew the ANPRM. 1 (82 FR 20311) 1 The ANPRM and the ANPRM withdrawal are available in the docket for this action. On November 15, 2021, the IIJA was enacted, Public Law 117-58, 135 Stat. 429 (H.R. 3684, Nov. 15, 2021). Section 23008(a) directed the Agency, within 1 year after the date of enactment, to solicit additional comments on the ANPRM to determine if data and information exist to support moving forward with a rulemaking. The Agency published the request for additional comments on May 10, 2022. (87 FR 29781) The comment period closed on June 9, 2022. Discussion of Comments The Agency received 21 public comments, with 9 commenters expressing general opposition to the mandatory State inspection requirement discussed in the 2016 ANPRM. Four commenters supported the establishment of such a requirement and the remaining commenters neither wholly supported nor opposed a possible requirement. Many commenters indicated that the existing standards for annual inspections prescribed in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations, or their own programs, were sufficient. Commenters also indicated that current standards are effective at mitigating risk when properly enforced. Several commenters made their support contingent on factors such as uniformity in inspection standards, standardization of inspector training, a self-inspection option, and required reciprocity, whereby States would be required to recognize inspections conducted outside their States. Many commenters, including State agencies in Arizona, Kentucky, Minnesota, Montana, New York, Virginia, and Wisconsin, addressed questions aimed at measuring the effectiveness of inspection programs. However, none of these commenters was able to determine whether the establishment of an inspection program reduced the number of safety violations detected. Several commenters suggested that FMCSA incentivize States to establish mandatory inspection programs by providing Federal funding. The American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance, and the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet noted that a mandate would be a strain on States' resources, particularly considering the ongoing financial challenges associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. FMCSA Decision After considering all the comments, FMCSA has concluded that the rationale for withdrawal of the 2016 ANPRM remains sound. The Agency is not aware of any new data or information that supports the development of a notice of proposed rulemaking to require the States to establish mandatory annual inspection programs for passenger-carrying vehicles. FMCSA therefore confirms withdrawal of the 2016 ANPRM referenced above. The concerns and recommendations of all the commenters will be considered if any new proposed regulations regarding annual inspections of passenger-carrying CMVs are developed. Issued under authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87. Robin Hutcheson, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2022-24708 Filed 11-14-22; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
5 references not yet in our index
  • 49 CFR 350
  • Pub. L. 112-141
  • 126 Stat. 405
  • 135 Stat. 429
  • 49 CFR 1.87
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Confirmation of withdrawn advance notice of proposed rulemaking
Cite49 CFR 350
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112-141
Stat.126 Stat. 405
Stat.135 Stat. 429
Cite49 CFR 1.87
Cites 6Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.