Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2022-10-06 · DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

472 words·~2 min read·/register/2022/10/06/2022-21747

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division Notice Pursuant to the Defense Production Act of 1950 Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 708 of the Defense Production Act of 1950 (“DPA”), that the Assistant Attorney General finds, with respect to the Voluntary Tanker Agreement (“VTA”) proposed by the Maritime Administration (“MARAD”), that the purposes of Section 708(c)(1) of the may not reasonably be achieved through a voluntary agreement or plan of action having less anticompetitive effects or without any voluntary agreement or plan of action.
Given this finding, the proposed Voluntary Agreement may become effective following the publication of this notice. Under the DPA, MARAD may enter into agreements with representatives of private industry for the purpose of improving the efficiency with which private firms contribute to the national defense when conditions exist that may pose a direct threat to the national defense or its preparedness. Such arrangements are generally known as “voluntary agreements.” A defense to actions brought under the antitrust laws is available to each participant acting within the scope of a voluntary agreement that has come into force under the DPA.
The DPA requires that each proposed voluntary agreement be reviewed by the Attorney General prior to becoming effective. If, after consulting with the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission, the Attorney General finds that the purpose of the DPA “may not be reasonably achieved through a voluntary agreement having less anticompetitive effects or without any voluntary agreement or plan of action,” the agreement may become effective. 50 U.S.C. 4558 (f)(l)(B). All functions which the Attorney General is required or authorized to perform by section 708 of the DPA have been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division. 28 CFR 0.40(l) The purpose of the proposed VTA is to support Department of Defense (“DoD”) contingency requirements to provide tanker capacity during times of crisis through procedures agreed in advance.
The proposed VTA establishes the terms, conditions and procedures under which participants agree voluntarily to make tankers available to the DoD. MARAD has certified that the proposed VTA is necessary to carry out its purpose. MARAD requested that the Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, issue a finding that the proposed Voluntary Agreement satisfies the statutory criteria set forth in 50 U.S.C. 4558(f)(1)(B). The Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, reviewed the proposed Voluntary Agreement and consulted on it with the Chair of the Federal Trade Commission.
On September 21, 2022, by letter to Ann C. Phillips, Maritime Administrator, Jonathan S. Kanter, Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, issued a finding pursuant to 50 U.S.C. 4558(f)(1)(B), that the purposes of the VTA “may not reasonably be achieved through a voluntary agreement . . . having less anticompetitive effects or without any voluntary agreement.” McCormick Conforti, Assistant Chief, Competition and Advocacy Section, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2022-21747 Filed 10-5-22; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 2
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.