Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2022-07-25 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal

468 words·~2 min read·/register/2022/07/25/2022-15808·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT
Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal
Citation: FR Doc. 2022-15808 · RIN 2120-AA66 · Docket No. FAA-2020-0651; Airspace Docket No. 18-AAL-13 · 14 CFR 71

Summary

The FAA is withdrawing the NPRM published in the Federal Register on September 4, 2020, proposing to amend VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal airway V-456 which would serve as an alternative to the Colored Federal airway Green-11 (G-11). Subsequent to the NPRM, the FAA determined during a flight check inspection that the desired altitudes along the proposed route amendment for V-456 did not meet the expected criteria and determined that the withdrawal of the proposed rule is warranted.

Dates

Effective date 0901 UTC, July 25, 2022, the proposed rule published September 4, 2020 (85 FR 55200) is withdrawn.

Supplementary Information

History The FAA published a NPRM in the Federal Register for Docket No. FAA-2020-0651 (85 FR 55200; September 4, 2020). The NPRM proposed to amend the VOR Federal airway V-456 and serve as an alternative to the Colored Federal airway G-11. G-11 obtained navigation guidance from the Glennallen, AK (GLA), Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) navigation aid (NAVAID) which was pending decommissioning. Subsequent to the NPRM, the FAA published a Final Rule in the Federal Register (85 FR 59668; September 23, 2020) removing G-11. Also subsequent to the NPRM, the FAA determined during a flight check inspection that the desired altitudes along the proposed route amendment for V-456 did not meet the expected criteria. Since the proposed new routing for V-456 offers no advantage to the present routing of the airway, the V-456 amendment will no longer be pursued. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal. No comments were received. FAA Conclusions The FAA has determined during a flight check inspection that the desired altitudes along the proposed route amendment for V-456 did not meet the expected criteria. Since the proposed new routing for V-456 offers no advantage to the present routing of the airway, the V-456 amendment will no longer be pursued. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). The Withdrawal Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the NPRM published in the Federal Register on September 4, 2020 (85 FR 55200), FR Doc. 2020-19496, is hereby withdrawn. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854; 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389. Issued in Washington, DC, on July 19, 2022. Scott M. Rosenbloom, Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations. [FR Doc. 2022-15808 Filed 7-22-22; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 71
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal
Cite14 CFR 71
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.