Rules and Regulations. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
854 words·~4 min read·
/register/2022/02/07/2022-02479·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD [Docket No. FD 36377 (Sub-No. 5)] BNSF Railway Company—Trackage Rights Exemption—Union Pacific Railroad Company By petition filed on December 13, 2021, BNSF Railway Company
(BNSF)requests that the Board partially revoke the trackage rights exemption granted to it under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7) in Docket No. FD 36377 (Sub-No. 4), as necessary to permit that trackage rights arrangement to expire at midnight on December 31, 2022. As explained by BNSF in its verified notice of exemption in Docket No. FD 36377 (Sub-No. 4), BNSF and Union Pacific Railroad Company
(UP)entered into an agreement granting BNSF restricted, local trackage rights over two rail lines owned by UP between:
(1)UP milepost 93.2 at Stockton, Cal., on UP's Oakland Subdivision, and UP milepost 219.4 at Elsey, Cal., on UP's Canyon Subdivision, a distance of 126.2 miles; and
(2)UP milepost 219.4 at Elsey, and UP milepost 280.7 at Keddie, Cal., on UP's Canyon Subdivision, a distance of 61.3 miles (collectively, the Lines). BNSF Verified Notice of Exemption 1-2, *BNSF Ry.—Trackage Rts. Exemption—Union Pac. R.R.,* FD 36377 (Sub-No. 4). BNSF further stated that the trackage rights arrangement is intended to permit BNSF to move empty and loaded unit ballast trains to and from the ballast pit located at Elsey. *Id.* at 2. BNSF filed its verified notice of exemption under the Board's class exemption procedures at 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7), explaining that, because the trackage rights covered by the notice in Docket No. FD 36377 (Sub-No. 4) are local rather than overhead rights, they do not qualify for the Board's class exemption for temporary trackage rights under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(8). BNSF Verified Notice of Exemption 1 n.1, *BNSF Ry.—Trackage Rts. Exemption—Union Pac. R.R.,* FD 36377 (Sub-No. 4). In its petition, BNSF asks the Board to partially revoke the exemption as necessary to permit the trackage rights to expire at midnight on December 31, 2022, pursuant to the parties' agreement. ( *See* BNSF Pet. 1-2); *see also* BNSF Verified Notice of Exemption Ex. B at 2, *BNSF Ry.—Trackage Rts. Exemption—Union Pac. R.R.,* FD 36377 (Sub-No. 4). BNSF argues that granting this petition will promote the rail transportation policy and that the revocation would be consistent with the limited scope of the transaction and would not have an adverse effect on shippers. (BNSF Pet. 3.) In addition, BNSF asserts that the Board has granted similar petitions for partial revocation to permit temporary trackage rights to expire, including petitions involving prior iterations of the trackage rights agreement at issue here. ( *Id.* ) Discussion and Conclusions Although BNSF and UP have expressly agreed on the duration of the proposed trackage rights agreement, trackage rights approved under the class exemption at 1180.2(d)(7) typically remain effective indefinitely, regardless of any contract provisions. Occasionally, however, the Board has partially revoked a trackage rights exemption to allow those rights to expire after a limited time period rather than lasting in perpetuity. *See, e.g.,* *BNSF Ry.--Trackage Rts. Exemption--Union Pac. R.R.,* FD 36377 (Sub-No. 3) (STB served Feb. 23, 2021) (granting a petition to partially revoke a trackage rights exemption involving the Lines at issue in this case); *New Orleans Pub. Belt R.R.—Trackage Rts. Exemption—Ill. Cent. R.R.,* FD 36198 (Sub-No. 1) (STB served June 20, 2018). Granting partial revocation in these circumstances to permit the trackage rights to expire at the end of 2022 would eliminate the need for BNSF to file a second pleading seeking discontinuance authority when the agreement expires, thereby promoting the aspects of the rail transportation policy at 49 U.S.C. 10101(2), (7), and (15). Moreover, partially revoking the exemption to limit the term of the trackage rights would have no adverse impact on shippers because the trackage rights at issue are solely to allow BNSF to move empty and loaded ballast trains to and from the ballast pit in Elsey for use in BNSF's maintenance-of-way projects. ( *See* BNSF Pet. 2.) Therefore, the Board will grant the petition and permit the trackage rights exempted in Docket No. FD 36377 (Sub-No. 4) to expire at midnight on December 31, 2022. To provide the statutorily mandated protection to any employee adversely affected by the discontinuance of trackage rights, the Board will impose the employee protective conditions set forth in *Oregon Short Line Railroad—Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch Between Firth & Ammon, in Bingham & Bonneville Counties, Idaho,* 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979). This action is categorically excluded from environmental review under 49 CFR 1105.6(c). *It is ordered:* 1. The petition for partial revocation of the trackage rights class exemption is granted. 2. As discussed above, the trackage rights in Docket No. FD 36377 (Sub-No. 4) are permitted to expire at midnight on December 31, 2022, subject to the employee protective conditions set forth in *Oregon Short Line.* 3. Notice of this decision will be published in the **Federal Register** . 4. This decision is effective on March 9, 2022. Petitions for stay must be filed by February 17, 2022. Petitions for reconsideration must be filed by February 28, 2022. By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Oberman, Primus, and Schultz. Aretha Laws-Byrum, Clearance Clerk. [FR Doc. 2022-02479 Filed 2-4-22; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
3 references not yet in our index
- 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7)
- 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(8)
- 49 CFR 1105.6(c)
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Cite49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7)
Cite49 CFR 1180.2(d)(8)
Cite49 CFR 1105.6(c)
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources