Notices. Petition for Reconsideration
242 words·~1 min read·
/register/2021/05/20/2021-10600·A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 64 [CG Docket No. 17-59; Report No. 3173; FRS 27311] Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Petition for Reconsideration. SUMMARY: Petition for Reconsideration (Petition) has been filed in the Commission's rulemaking proceeding by Joshua M. Bercu, on behalf of USTelecom—The Broadband Association. DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before June 4, 2021.
Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before June 14, 2021. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerusha Burnett, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau,
(202)418-0526 or *Jerusha.Burnett@fcc.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's document, Report No. 3173, released May 11, 2021. The full text of the Petition can be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System at: *http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/.* The Commission will not send a Congressional Review Act
(CRA)submission to Congress or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission. *Subject:* Advanced Methods to Target and Eliminate Unlawful Robocalls, published 86 FR 17726, April 6, 2021, in CG Docket No 17-59. This document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). *See also* 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g). *Number of Petitions Filed:* 1. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2021-10600 Filed 5-19-21; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
U.S. Code
3 references not yet in our index
- 47 CFR 64
- 47 CFR 1.429(e)
- 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 4Cited by 0 across 0 sources