Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2021-04-13 · Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice

893 words·~4 min read·/register/2021/04/13/2021-07552·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD
Action: Notice
Citation: FR Doc. 2021-07552 · Docket No. FR-7035-N-19

Summary

HUD has submitted the proposed information collection requirement described below to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act. The purpose of this notice is to allow for an additional 30 days of public comment.

Dates

Comments Due Date: May 13, 2021.

Supplementary Information

This notice informs the public that HUD has submitted to OMB a request for approval of the information collection described in Section A. The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the information collection for a period of 60 days was published on January 25, 2021 at 86 FR 6912. A. Overview of Information Collection Title of Information Collection: Requirements for Designating Housing Projects. OMB Approval Number: 2577-0192. Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection. Form Number: None. Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The information collection burden associated with designated housing is required by statute. Section 10 of the Housing Opportunity and Extension Act of 1996 modified Section 7 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 to require Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) to submit a plan for HUD approval before a project(s) can be designated as either elderly only, disabled only, or elderly and disabled. In this plan, PHAs must document why the designation is needed and provide the following information: 1. Description of the designated housing plan; 2. Justification for the designation; 3. Availability of alternative housing resources for the non-designated population(s); 4. Impact on the availability of accessible housing; 5. A statement that existing tenants in good standing will not be evicted; 6. A statement of the resources that will be made available if the PHA offers voluntary relocation benefits; and 7. Information describing how the DHP is consistent with any outstanding court orders, lawsuits, investigations, Voluntary Compliance Agreements (VCAs), Conciliation Agreements, or Letters of Findings or Determinations, etc., including for example, actions under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, the Age Discrimination Act, the Fair Housing Act, or the Americans with Disabilities Act. Respondents ( i.e. affected public): State, or Local Government. Estimated Number of Respondents: 18. Estimated Number of Responses: 1. Frequency of Response: On occasion. Average Hours per Response: 15 hours. Total Estimated Burdens: 270 hours. The previous estimation of 585 annual burden hours has been reduced to 270. This change is based on the average number of Plans submitted between Calendar Years 2017, 2018 and 2019. HUD expects that the number of respondents will continue to decline because of the trend in Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) repositioning their developments and moving out of the public housing program. The national average PHA staff salary = $51,000 1 per year or $24.00 per hour. The calculation for costs is as follows: 18 PHAs × 15 hours = 270 hours × $24 2 = $6,480. 1 ziprecruiter.com, . 2 Computed Hourly Rates of Pay Using the 2,087-Hour Divisor, . Information collection Number of respondents * Average number of reponses per respondent Total annual responses Burden hours/minutes per response Total hours Hourly cost Total annual cost 2577-0192 18 1 18 15 270 $24.00 $6,480 B. Solicitation of Public Comment This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. (5) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions. C. Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. Colette Pollard, Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2021-07552 Filed 4-12-21; 8:45 am]

★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.