Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2021-02-01 · Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice of denials

823 words·~4 min read·/register/2021/02/01/2021-02015

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2021-0002] Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of denials. SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to deny applications from 37 individuals who requested an exemption from the vision standard in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSRs) to operate a CMV in interstate commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Christine A. Hydock, Chief, Medical Programs Division,
(202)366-4001, *fmcsamedical@dot.gov,* FMCSA, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. If you have questions regarding viewing materials in the docket, contact Dockets Operations,
(202)366-9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Public Participation A. Viewing Documents and Comments To view comments, as well as any documents mentioned in this notice as being available in the docket, go to *http://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=FMCSA-2021-0002* and choose the document to review. If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket online by visiting Dockets Operations in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the DOT West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call
(202)366-9317 or
(202)366-9826 before visiting Dockets Operations. B. Privacy Act In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information the commenter provides, to *www.regulations.gov,* as described in the system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at *www.transportation.gov/privacy.* II. Background FMCSA received applications from 37 individuals who requested an exemption from the vision standard in the FMCSRs. FMCSA has evaluated the eligibility of these applicants and concluded that granting these exemptions would not provide a level of safety that would be equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety that would be obtained by complying with § 391.41(b)(10). III. Basis for Exemption Determination Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b), FMCSA may grant an exemption from the FMCSRs for no longer than a 5-year period if it finds such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such exemption. FMCSA grants exemptions from the FMCSRs for a 2-year period to align with the maximum duration of a driver's medical certification. The Agency's decision regarding these exemption applications is based on medical reports about the applicants' vision, as well as their driving records and experience driving with the vision deficiency. IV. Conclusion The Agency has determined that these applicants do not satisfy the eligibility criteria or meet the terms and conditions of the Federal exemption and granting these exemptions would not provide a level of safety that would be equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety that would be obtained by complying with § 391.41(b)(10). Therefore, the 37 applicants in this notice have been denied exemptions from the physical qualification standards in § 391.41(b)(10). Each applicant has, prior to this notice, received a letter of final disposition regarding his/her exemption request. Those decision letters fully outlined the basis for the denial and constitute final action by the Agency. This notice summarizes the Agency's recent denials as required under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by periodically publishing names and reasons for denial. The following 18 applicants had no experience operating a CMV: Dut J. Acuoth
(NY)Wyatt W. Brown
(IA)James R. Bruner
(AL)Gareth S. Collins
(AZ)Maira A. Giraldo
(TX)Richard E. Hordon
(NH)Eddie Howard
(NM)Chen N. Nguyen
(IA)John R. Pruitt
(AR)Martin K. Ramos
(FL)Aaron Rot
(TX)Adam L. Scorza
(CA)Gabriel P. Serna
(AZ)Shabria N. Shepherd
(AL)Satvir Singh
(NJ)Coltin Upchurch
(KS)Aimable Vuningoma
(TX)Caleb Zane
(NY)The following 10 applicants did not have 3 years of experience driving a CMV on public highways with their vision deficiencies: Jose M. Almarez
(IL)David D. Brown
(ID)Jonathan F. Curtis
(IL)Wesley H. Eldred
(WA)Jason J. Forward
(TX)Jeremiah R. Gladen
(CA)Shawn M. Osborn
(MO)William F. Preston
(OH)Daniel I. Smith
(WA)Dennis M. Wright The following three applicants did not have 3 years of recent experience driving a CMV on public highways with their vision deficiencies: Derrick V. Arter
(MD)Jose O. Diaz Rosado
(PA)Michael L. Leschner
(MN)The following four applicants were denied for multiple reasons: Kenneth W. Courtney
(AL)Jason A. Melo
(NH)George R. Miller
(PA)Ryan L. VanZanten
(PA)The following applicant has not had stable vision for the preceding 3-year period: Sheldon Blanton
(TX)The following applicant drove interstate while restricted to intrastate driving: Henry E. Brown
(IL)Larry W. Minor, Associate Administrator for Policy. [FR Doc. 2021-02015 Filed 1-29-21; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice of denials
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.