Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2020-07-06 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Notices

Notices. Notice

1,027 words·~5 min read·/register/2020/07/06/2020-14365

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2019-N-5841] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for Qualitative Data To Support Social and Behavioral Research for Food, Dietary Supplements, Cosmetics, and Animal Food and Feed AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). DATES: Submit written comments (including recommendations) on the collection of information by August 5, 2020. ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be submitted *https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.* Find this particular information collection by selecting “Currently under Review—Open for Public Comments” or by using the search function. The title of this information collection is “Generic Clearance for Qualitative Data to Support Social and Behavioral Research for Food, Dietary Supplements, Cosmetics, and Animal Food and Feed.” Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-7726, *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. Generic Clearance for Qualitative Data to Support Social and Behavioral Research for Food, Dietary Supplements, Cosmetics, and Animal Food and Feed OMB Control Number 0910-NEW This notice announces the FDA information collection request from the OMB for a generic clearance that will allow FDA to use qualitative social/behavioral science data collection techniques ( *i.e.,* individual in-depth interviews, small group discussions, focus groups, and observations) to understand stakeholders' perceptions, attitudes, motivations, and behaviors better regarding various issues associated with food and cosmetic products, dietary supplements, and animal food and feed. Understanding consumers', manufacturers', and producers' perceptions, attitudes, motivations, and behaviors plays an important role in improving FDA's communications impacting these various stakeholders and in assisting in the development of quantitative study proposals, complementing other important research efforts in the Agency. FDA will only submit a collection for approval under this generic clearance if it meets the following conditions: • The collections are voluntary; • the collections are low burden for participants (based on considerations of total burden hours, total number of participants, or burden hours per participant) and are low cost for both the participants and the Federal Government; • the collections are noncontroversial; • personally identifiable information
(PII)is collected only to the extent necessary 1 and is not retained; 1 For example, collections that collect PII to provide remuneration for participants of focus groups and cognitive laboratory studies will be submitted under this request. All Privacy Act requirements will be met. • information gathered will not be used for the purpose of substantially informing influential policy decisions; 2 and. 2 As defined in OMB and Agency Information Quality Guidelines, “influential” means that “an agency can reasonably determine that dissemination of the information will have or does have a clear and substantial impact on important public policies or important private sector decisions.” • information gathered will yield qualitative information; the collections will not be designed or expected to yield statistical data or used as though the results are generalizable to the population of study. If these conditions are not met, FDA will submit an information collection request to OMB for approval through the normal PRA process. To obtain approval for a collection that meets the conditions of this generic clearance, an abbreviated supporting statement will be submitted to OMB along with supporting documentation ( *e.g.,* a copy of the interview or moderator guide, screening questionnaire). FDA will submit individual qualitative collections under this generic clearance to the OMB. Individual qualitative collections will also undergo review by FDA's institutional review board, senior leadership in the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, and PRA specialists. *Description of Participants:* Participants in this collection of information may include a wide range of consumers and other FDA stakeholders such as producers and manufacturers who are regulated under FDA-regulated food and cosmetic products, dietary supplements, and animal food and feed. In the **Federal Register** of February 10, 2020 (85 FR 7564), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. Although five comments were received, they were not responsive to the four collection of information topics solicited and therefore will not be discussed in this document. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: Table 1—Estimated Annual Reporting Burden, by Anticipated Data Collection Methods Type of interview Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Total annual responses Average burden per response Total hours Individual In-Depth Interview Screening 4,800 1 4,800 0.08 (5 minutes) 384 Individual In-Depth Interviews 400 1 400 1 400 Focus Group/Small Group Participant Screening 10,800 1 10,800 0.08 (5 minutes) 864 Focus Group/Small Group Discussion 3,600 1 3,600 1.5 5,400 Observation Screening 720 1 720 0.08 (5 minutes) 58 Observations 144 1 144 2 288 Total 20,464 7,394 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. The total estimated annual burden is 7,394 hours and 20,464 responses. Current estimates are based on both historical numbers of participants from past projects as well as estimates for projects to be conducted in the next 3 years. The number of participants to be included in each new collection will vary, depending on the nature of the compliance efforts and the target audience. The estimated burden hours for focus groups for this collection of information have been increased from the burden published in the **Federal Register** on February 10, 2020, to the burden published in this **Federal Register** notice. The adjustment in burden hours for focus groups reflects the increased need for this type of data collection across the above-mentioned topic areas. Dated: June 29, 2020. Lowell J. Schiller, Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2020-14365 Filed 7-2-20; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.