Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2019-08-19 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Notices

Notices. Notice

797 words·~4 min read·/register/2019/08/19/2019-17713·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0093] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Review Transparency and Communication in Reviews of 351(k) Biologics License Applications in Biosimilars User Fee Act AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration
(FDA)is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by September 18, 2019. ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, Fax: 202-395-7285, or emailed to *oira_submission@omb.eop.gov.* All comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0746. Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Domini Bean, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-5733, *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. Evaluation of the Program for Enhanced Review Transparency and Communication for New Molecular Entity New Drug Applications and Original Biologics License Applications in Prescription Drug User Fee Acts and 351(k) Biologics License Applications in Biosimilars User Fee Act OMB Control Number 0910-0746—Extension This information collection supports the above captioned review program (“the Program”). The Program is part of our performance commitment under the fifth and sixth authorizations of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA), which allows us to collect user fees for the review of human drug and biologics applications for FYs 2013 through 2021, and the second authorization of the Biosimilars User Fee Act (BsUFA II), which applies to 351(k) BLAs for FYs 2018 through 2021. The Program is described in detail in FDA's Commitment Letters for PDUFA VI and BsUFA II, available at *https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/PrescriptionDrugUserFee/UCM511438.pdf* and *https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/BiosimilarUserFeeActBsUFA/UCM521121.pdf.* The Program goals are to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the first review cycle and decrease the number of review cycles necessary for approval so that patients have timely access to safe, effective, and high quality new drugs and biologics. A key aspect of the extension of the Program to BsUFA II is to conduct an interim and final assessment that will evaluate how well the parameters of the Program have achieved the intended goals. The BsUFA II Commitment Letter specifies that an independent contractor can conduct the assessments and specifies that they include interviews of sponsors who submit 351(k) BLAs to the Program in BsUFA II. In accordance with the PDUFA V and BsUFA II Commitment Letters, we contracted Eastern Research Group, Inc.
(ERG)to conduct independent interviews of applicants after FDA issues a first-cycle action for applications reviewed under the Program. The purpose of these interviews is to collect feedback from applicants on the success of the Program in increasing transparency and communication of reviews during the review process. ERG will anonymize and aggregate sponsor responses before inclusion in the assessments and presentation materials at public meetings. We will publish in the **Federal Register** for public comment ERG's assessments with interview results and findings. In the **Federal Register** of March 12, 2019 (84 FR 8877), we published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed collection of information. No comments were received. We estimate the burden of the information collection as follows: Table 1—Estimated Annual Reporting Burden 1 Portion of study Number of respondents Number of responses per respondent Total annual responses Average burden per response Total hours Pre-test 5 1 5 1.5 7.5 Interviews 75 1 75 1.5 112.5 Total 120 1 There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. Since the last OMB approval of the information collection, we have adjusted our estimate downward by 60 survey respondents. We base our estimate on the most recent number of annual surveys. ERG interviews between one and three sponsor representatives for each 351(k) BLA first-cycle action issued for applications reviewed under the Program. ERG also conducts a pretest of the interview protocol with five respondents. Assuming it will take 1 to 1.5 hours to complete the pretest, we calculate a total of 7.5 annual burden hours. We estimate that up to 75 respondents will take part in the post-action interviews each year. Assuming each interview will last 1 to 1.5 hours, we calculate a total of 112.5 annual burden hours. Dated: August 12, 2019. Lowell J. Schiller, Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2019-17713 Filed 8-16-19; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.