Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2019-07-17 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Notices

Notices. Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal

466 words·~2 min read·/register/2019/07/17/2019-15121

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 73 [Docket No. FAA-2019-0094; Airspace Docket No. 15-AWP-17] RIN 2120-AA66 Proposed Establishment of Restricted Area R-7202; Guam, GU AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); withdrawal. SUMMARY: The FAA is withdrawing the NPRM published in the **Federal Register** on March 5, 2019, proposing to establish Restricted Area R-7202 on the island of Guam, GU.
The FAA does not establish restricted areas for small arms gun ranges. DATES: The proposed rule establishing Restricted Area R-7202 is withdrawn as of July 17, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Ready, Airspace Policy Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone:
(202)267-8783. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: History The FAA published a NPRM in the **Federal Register** for Docket No. FAA-2019-0094. (84 FR 7840; March 5, 2019). The NPRM proposed to establish restricted area R-7202 on the island of Guam, GU. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal. Six comments were received. Discussion of Comments Three comments were in support of the proposal. One commenter suggested relocating the range to a location where bird and wildlife have been eradicated due to military expansion, as the proposed location would disrupt bird and wildlife. One commenter questioned the altitude of the proposal in relation to the weapons being proposed. One commenter questioned the United States Marine Corps
(USMC)move from Okinawa due to China's tyrannical influences on Japan. FAA's Conclusions The FAA does not issue restricted areas for small arms gun ranges within the United States. Issuing a restricted area for small arm gun ranges in Guam would set a precedent nationwide at military and countless civilian gun clubs. This proliferation of restricted areas would result in inefficient management of the National Airspace System (NAS). The USMC purpose and need for the airspace is to provide a safe and effective area for live-fire training. The FAA allows for live-fire training at small arm gun ranges in within the United States without a restricted area. The USMC has numerous live fire ranges without the segregation that a restricted area provides and can complete their mission safely and effectively in Guam without one. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73 Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted areas. The Withdrawal Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the FAA withdraws the NPRM published in the **Federal Register** on March 5, 2019 (84 FR 7840), FR Doc. 2019-03931, is hereby withdrawn. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389. Issued in Washington, DC, on July 8, 2019. Rodger A. Dean Jr., Manager, Airspace Policy Group. [FR Doc. 2019-15121 Filed 7-16-19; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.