Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2019-04-18 · Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date

724 words·~3 min read·/register/2019/04/18/2019-07835·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Action: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date
Citation: FR Doc. 2019-07835 · RIN 3150-AK28 · NRC-2019-0030 · 10 CFR 72

Summary

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is confirming the effective date of May 13, 2019, for the direct final rule that was published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2019. The direct final rule amended the NRC's spent fuel storage regulations by revising the Holtec International HI-STORM 100 Cask System listing within the “List of approved spent fuel storage casks” to include Amendment No. 13 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1014. Amendment No. 13 revises Appendix B of the technical specifications to update the initial uranium weight for the 16x16B and 16x16C assembly classes to match the value for 16x16A.

Dates

Effective date: The effective date of May 13, 2019, for the direct final rule published February 26, 2019 (84 FR 6055), is confirmed.

Supplementary Information

On February 26, 2019 (84 FR 6055), the NRC published a direct final rule amending its regulations in part 72 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations to the HI-STORM 100 System listing within § 72.214, “List of approved spent fuel storage casks,” to include Amendment No. 13 to Certificate of Compliance No. 1014. Amendment No. 13 revises Appendix B of the technical specifications to update the initial uranium weight for the 16x16B and 16x16C assembly classes to match the value for 16x16A. In the direct final rule, the NRC stated that if no significant adverse comments were received, the direct final rule would become effective on May 13, 2019. As described more fully in the direct final rule, a significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. The NRC received one comment and has determined that it is not a significant adverse comment. The comment requested that small entities suffering from dishonor and long term endangerment inflicted by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 be awarded relief immediately at fair market value. As this rulemaking only addressed changes to the technical specifications for dry shielded canisters used to store nuclear waste on-site, the NRC determined this comment to be out of scope of this direct final rule. Because no significant adverse comments were received, this direct final rule will become effective as scheduled. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of April 2019. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Cindy K. Bladey, Chief, Regulatory Analysis and Rulemaking Support Branch, Division of Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2019-07835 Filed 4-17-19; 8:45 am]

Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 10 CFR 72
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date
Cite10 CFR 72
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.