Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2019-04-11 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT) · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. Notice of interpretation; withdrawal

338 words·~2 min read·/register/2019/04/11/2019-07215·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 91 [Docket No. FAA-2014-0396] Interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft; Withdrawal AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of interpretation; withdrawal. SUMMARY: This action withdraws the FAA's interpretation of the special rule for model aircraft. That interpretation no longer is valid or necessary because Congress repealed the special rule for model aircraft.
DATES: The interpretation published on June 25, 2014 (79 FR 36172) is withdrawn as of April 11, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan W. Cross, Regulations Division, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone 202-267-7173; email: *jonathan.cross@faa.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 336 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
(FMRA)established the special rule for model aircraft (Pub. L. 112-95, Feb. 14, 2012). On June 25, 2014, the FAA published an interpretation of that special rule with a request for comments (79 FR 36172). The interpretation clarified, among other things, that:
(1)Model aircraft must satisfy all criteria of section 336(a) to qualify as model aircraft and be exempt from future FAA rulemaking; and
(2)the FAA retains enforcement authority against operators who endanger the safety of the national airspace system. The FAA received more than 18,000 comments from organizations and individuals to the interpretation. Section 349 of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 repealed section 336 of FMRA and replaced it with a new exception to conduct limited recreational operations of unmanned aircraft without FAA certification or operating authority (Pub. L. 115-254, Oct. 5, 2018). As a result of the repeal of the special rule for model aircraft, the FAA's June 25, 2014, interpretation is no longer valid or necessary. Accordingly, the FAA is withdrawing the interpretation. Because that interpretation is withdrawn, the FAA will take no further action to respond to any comments to the interpretation. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 12, 2019. Daniel K. Elwell, Acting Administrator. [FR Doc. 2019-07215 Filed 4-10-19; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
2 references not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 91
  • Pub. L. 112-95
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
Notice of interpretation; withdrawal
Cite14 CFR 91
Pub. L.Pub. L. 112-95
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.