Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2019-03-18 · Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); correction

620 words·~3 min read·/register/2019/03/18/2019-04658·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT
Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); correction
Citation: FR Doc. 2019-04658 · RIN 2120-AL00 · Docket No.: FAA-2017-1051; Notice No. 10-86 · 14 CFR 13

Summary

The FAA is correcting an NPRM published on February 12, 2019. In that document, the FAA proposed to amend its regulations to the procedural rules governing Federal Aviation Administration investigations and enforcement actions. This document corrects two errors in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of that document and one error in the footnote of the “Subpart A—General Authority To Re-Delegate and Investigative Procedures” section of that document.

Dates

The comment period for the proposed rule published February 12, 2019, at will close May 13, 2019.

Supplementary Information

Background On February 12, 2019, the FAA published an NPRM entitled, “Update to Investigative and Enforcement Procedures” (84 FR 3614). In that NPRM the FAA proposed to amend its regulations to the procedural rules governing Federal Aviation Administration investigations and enforcement actions. The proposed revisions include updates to statutory and regulatory references, updates to agency organizational structure, elimination of inconsistencies, clarification of ambiguity, increases in efficiency, and improved readability. In the NPRM, the incorrect attorney is listed as the contact person for subpart G and another attorney was not identified as additional contact person for subpart G. The footnote discussing the proposed changes to 14 CFR 13.1 incorrectly identifies a FAA Order. This document corrects these errors to accurately reflect the contact information for questions concerning 14 CFR part 13, subpart G and the FAA Order referenced. Correction In FR Doc. 2019-00771, Vol. 84, No. 29, beginning on page 3614 in the Federal Register of February 12, 2019, make the following corrections: 1. On page 3614, in the second column, in the first paragraph under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT correct “For questions concerning this action regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart D, contact John A. Dietrich” to read “For questions concerning this action regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart D and G, contact John A. Dietrich” and correct “For questions concerning this action regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart G, contact Vicki S. Leemon, Office of the Chief Counsel, Office of Adjudication, AGC-70, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-0415; email: ” to read “For questions concerning this action regarding 14 CFR part 13, subpart G, you may also contact Marie Collins, Office of the Chief Counsel, Office of Adjudication, AGC-70, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3522; email: .” 2. On Page 3617, in the first column, in the footnotes, correct “FAA Order 1150.154A” to read FAA Order 1100.154A”. Issued On: March 4, 2019. Lirio Liu, Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking. [FR Doc. 2019-04658 Filed 3-15-19; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 14 CFR 13
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); correction
Cite14 CFR 13
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.