Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2019-03-06 · Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Proposed rule; supplement

545 words·~2 min read·/register/2019/03/06/2019-04052·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
Action: Proposed rule; supplement
Citation: FR Doc. 2019-04052 · CMS-4185-N2 · 42 CFR 422

Summary

This document announces the release of data underlying the proposed policies regarding the use of extrapolation in Medicare Advantage (MA) Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audits and the Fee-for-Service (FFS) Adjuster.

Dates

The data announced in this supplement is available on March 1, 2019.

Supplementary Information

I. Background In the November 1, 2018 Federal Register (83 FR 54982), we published a proposed rule titled “Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage (MA), Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit, Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), Medicaid Fee-For-Service, and Medicaid Managed Care Programs for Years 2020 and 2021”. The proposed rule included preamble language and regulatory provisions regarding the proposed MA Risk Adjustment Data Validation (RADV) audit methodology, and the proposal not to apply a Fee-For-Service (FFS) Adjuster (83 FR 55037 through 55041 and 55077). Prior to the release of the proposed rule, we posted a FFS Adjuster Study on October 26, 2018. In the December 27, 2018 Federal Register (83 FR 66661), we published a document stating that we planned on releasing data underlying the FFS Adjuster Study and extending the comment period for the RADV provisions to April 30, 2019, in order to maximize the opportunity for the public to provide meaningful input to CMS. II. Provisions of the Supplement This document announces that data, underlying our proposal not to apply a RADV FFS Adjuster, is available to the public through the Office of Enterprise Data Analytics (OEDA). Persons or entities requesting the data must complete and submit a Limited Data Set (LDS) Data Use Agreement (DUA) along with the required fee to CMS. The LDS DUA request forms and instructions are available via the CMS website at . Lastly, additional documentation and data related to the RADV FFS Adjuster Study is posted on the Private Plans Team website at . We are releasing these data so the public can both provide meaningful comments regarding the proposed RADV provisions in the November 2018 proposed rule (83 FR 55037 through 55041 and 55077) and generate information that will be useful to the agency's decision makers. Our ability to meaningfully evaluate and respond to comments may depend on the extent to which commenters disclose any methodologies, statistical analyses, audit findings, and other factors underlying the comments. III. Collection of Information Requirements This document does not impose information collection requirements, that is, reporting, recordkeeping or third-party disclosure requirements. Consequently, there is no need for review by the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ). Dated: February 28, 2019. Seema Verma, Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. [FR Doc. 2019-04052 Filed 3-4-19; 11:15 am]

Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 42 CFR 422
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; supplement
Cite42 CFR 422
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.