Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2018-11-21 · DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE · Notices

Notices. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

482 words·~2 min read·/register/2018/11/21/2018-25409·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3510-16-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; “Patent Review and Derivation Proceedings” The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) will submit to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for clearance the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). *Agency:* United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce *Title:* Patent Review and Derivation Proceedings. *Form Number(s):* N/A. *Type of Request:* Regular. *Number of Respondents:* 11.994 responses per year. *Average Hours per Response:* The USPTO estimates that it will take the public between an estimated 6 minutes (0.10 hours) to 165.30 hours to complete an individual form in this collection. *Burden Hours:* 1,474,449 hours. *Cost Burden:* $54,307,175 per year. *Needs and Uses:* The public will use this information collection to petition the Board to seek the institution of—and to participate in— *inter partes* reviews, post-grant reviews, covered business method patent reviews, and derivation proceedings. The Board disseminated information that it collections (unless filed under seal) through various publications and databases. This information collection includes the filings of the parties and decisions and orders by the Board in trials and derivation proceedings. Opinions authored by the Board have varying degrees of authority attached to them. There are precedential opinions which, when published, are binding and provide the criteria and authority that the Board will use to decide all other factually similar cases (until the opinion is overruled or changed by statute). There are informative opinions, which are non-precedential and illustrate the norms of Board decision-making for the public. There are representative opinions, which are non-precedential and are publicly available opinions that are not designed as precedential or informative. Since public policy favors a widespread publication of opinions, the Board publishes all publicly available opinions, even if the opinions are not binding precedent upon the Board. *Affected Public:* Businesses or other for-profits; not-for-profit institutions. *Frequency:* On occasion. *Respondent's Obligation:* Required to Obtain or Retain Benefits. *OMB Desk Officer:* Nicholas A. Fraser, email: *Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov* . Once submitted, the request will be publically available in electronic format through *www.reginfo.gov* . Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections currently under review by OMB. Further information can be obtained by: • *Email: InformationCollection@uspto.gov* . Include “0651-0069 copy request” in the subject line of the message. • *Mail:* Marcie Lovett, Records and Information Governance Division Director, Office of the Chief Administrative Officer, United States Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent on or before December 21, 2018 to Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB Desk Officer, via email to *Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov,* or by fax to 202-395-5167, marked to the attention of Nicholas A. Fraser. Marcie Lovett, Records Management Division Director, USPTO, Office of the Chief Administrative Officer. [FR Doc. 2018-25409 Filed 11-20-18; 8:45 am]
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.