Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2018-09-10 · U.S. International Trade Commission · Notices

Notices. Notice

674 words·~3 min read·/register/2018/09/10/2018-19584

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION The Appointment of the Commission's Administrative Law Judges for Section 337 Investigations AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission's administrative law judges (“ALJs”) have been appointed in conformance with the Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution and with the Tariff Act. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202)708-2532. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at *http://www.usitc.gov.* Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission TDD terminal on
(202)205-1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), provides for certain determinations to be “made on the record after notice and opportunity for a hearing in conformity with the provisions of subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5.” 19 U.S.C. 1337(c). Pursuant to subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, the Commission employs ALJs to conduct formal adjudications and to make initial and recommended determinations. 5 U.S.C. 556-557; 19 CFR 210.3 (“administrative law judge”). Pursuant to section 331 of the Tariff Act, 19 U.S.C. 1331, the Chairman of the Commission has the authority to “appoint and fix the compensation of such employees of the Commission as he deems necessary,” including ALJs. 19 U.S.C. 1331(a)(1)(A)(1). Any such decision by the Chairman, however, is “subject to disapproval by a majority vote of all the commissioners in office.” *Id.* § 1331(a)(1)(C). The hiring of the Commission's ALJs has been in conformity with Titles 5 and 19 of the U.S. Code, as well as with such regulations as were then in force by the Office of Personnel Management, 5 CFR 930.201-.211. The Appointments Clause of the Constitution, art. II, § 2, cl. 2, provides, in relevant part, that Congress may vest the appointment of inferior officers “in the Heads of Departments.” In the past two years, there have been legal developments concerning the Appointments Clause. These developments have included the 2016 decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit finding ALJs of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to be “inferior officers” for the purpose of the Appointments Clause, *Bandimere* v. *SEC,* 844 F.3d 1168, 1188 (10th Cir. 2016), *reh'g en banc denied* (May 3, 2017). In 2018, the Supreme Court decided that the ALJs of the SEC are inferior officers whose appointments were to be made by SEC and not by the SEC's staff. *Lucia* v. *SEC,* 138 S. Ct. 2044, 2053-54 (2018); *see Free Enterprise Fund* v. *Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd.,* 561 U.S. 477, 512 (2010). The hiring of the Commission's ALJs is, and has been, consistent with the Appointments Clause and with the Commission's organic statute. Throughout at least the period of time between the hiring of the most-senior ALJ at the Commission (Chief Judge Bullock) until the present, the appointment of ALJs has been made by the Chairman, and no Commissioner has initiated a vote to disapprove the appointment of an ALJ, as is the Commissioner's right under 19 U.S.C. 1331(a)(1)(C). Out of an abundance of caution, on March 14 and 15, 2018, the Commission (then-Chairman Schmidtlein, joined by then-Vice Chairman Johanson, and Commissioners Williamson and Broadbent) voted, by notational voting, to ratify the earlier appointments of Judges Bullock, Lord, McNamara, Pender and Shaw. Also out of an abundance of caution, on February 8, 2018, the Commission voted, by notational voting, in connection with Judge Cheney's original appointment. Accordingly, the Commission's ALJs have all been appointed and/or ratified in conformance with the Constitution, and all applicable statutes and regulations. In addition, by this Notice, the Commission reiterates its approval of the appointments of Judges Bullock, Cheney, Lord, McNamara, Pender, and Shaw as its own under the Constitution. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 5, 2018. Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2018-19584 Filed 9-7-18; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
4 references not yet in our index
  • 5 USC 556-557
  • 5 CFR 930.201
  • 844 F.3d 1168
  • 561 U.S. 477
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
F. App'x844 F.3d 1168
SCOTUS561 U.S. 477
Cite5 USC 556-557
Cite5 CFR 930.201
Cites 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.