Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2018-04-27 · U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Department of Homeland Security · Rules and Regulations

Rules and Regulations. 60-Day notice and request for comments; extension of an existing collection of information

796 words·~4 min read·/register/2018/04/27/2018-08878·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Department of Homeland Security
Action: 60-Day notice and request for comments; extension of an existing collection of information
Citation: FR Doc. 2018-08878 · 1651-0117

Summary

The Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). The information collection is published in the Federal Register to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted (no later than June 26, 2018) to be assured of consideration.

Supplementary Information

CBP invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on the proposed and/or continuing information collections pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ). This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.8. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies should address one or more of the following four points: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) suggestions to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) suggestions to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The comments that are submitted will be summarized and included in the request for approval. All comments will become a matter of public record. Overview of This Information Collection Title: Free Trade agreements. OMB Number: 1651-0117. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Extension (without change). Current Actions: CBP proposes to extend the expiration date of this information collection with no change to the burden hours or to the information collected. Affected Public: Businesses. Abstract: Free trade agreements are established to reduce and eliminate trade barriers, strengthen and develop economic relations, and to lay the foundation for further cooperation to expand and enhance benefits of the agreement. These agreements establish free trade by reduced-duty treatment on imported goods. The U.S. has entered into the following Free Trade Agreements: United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement (US-CFTA) (Pub. L. 108-77); the Republic of Singapore (Pub. L. 108-78, 117 Stat. 948, 19 U.S.C. 3805 note); Australia (Pub. L. 108-286); Morocco (Pub. L. 108-302); Jordan (Pub. L. 107-43); Bahrain (Pub. L. 109-169); Oman (Pub. L. 109-283); Peru (Pub. L. 110-138, 121 Stat. 1455); Korea (Pub. L. 112-41); Colombia (Pub. L. 112-42, 125 Stat. 462); Panama (Pub. L. 112-43); and Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua (CAFTA-DR) (Pub. L. 109-53, 119 Stat. 462). These free trade agreements involve collection of data elements such as information about the importer and exporter of the goods, a description of the goods, tariff classification number, and the preference criterion in the Rules of Origin. Respondents can obtain information on how to make claims under these Free Trade Agreements by going to and use a standard fillable format for the FTA submission by going to . Estimated Number of Respondents: 359,400. Estimated Number of Total Annual Responses: 361,000. Estimated Time per Response: 2 hours. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 722,000. Dated: April 24, 2018. Seth D Renkema, Branch Chief, Economic Impact Analysis Branch, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. [FR Doc. 2018-08878 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]

Connectionstraces to 2
17 references not yet in our index
  • 5 CFR 1320.8
  • Pub. L. 108-77
  • Pub. L. 108-78
  • 117 Stat. 948
  • Pub. L. 108-286
  • Pub. L. 108-302
  • Pub. L. 107-43
  • Pub. L. 109-169
  • Pub. L. 109-283
  • Pub. L. 110-138
  • 121 Stat. 1455
  • Pub. L. 112-41
  • Pub. L. 112-42
  • 125 Stat. 462
  • Pub. L. 112-43
  • Pub. L. 109-53
  • 119 Stat. 462
Citation graph
cites case law
Rules and Regulations
60-Day notice and request for comments; extension of an existing collection of information
Cite5 CFR 1320.8
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-77
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-78
Stat.117 Stat. 948
Pub. L.Pub. L. 108-286
Cites 19 · showing 7Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.