Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2017-08-02 · Office of the United States Trade Representative · Notices

Notices. Notice

462 words·~2 min read·/register/2017/08/02/2017-16288

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 3290-F7-P OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE Fiscal Year 2017 Allocation of Additional Tariff-Rate Quota Volume for Raw Cane Sugar AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative
(USTR)is providing notice of country-by-country allocations of additional Fiscal Year
(FY)2017 in-quota quantity of the tariff-rate quota
(TRQ)for imported raw cane sugar as announced by Secretary of Agriculture on July 25, 2017. DATES: This notice is applicable on August 2, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Baumgarten, Office of Agricultural Affairs,
(202)395-9583 or *Ronald_Baumgarten@ustr.eop.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Additional U.S. Note 5 to Chapter 17 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTS), the United States maintains TRQs for imports of raw cane and refined sugar. Section 404(d)(3) of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 3601(d)(3)) authorizes the President to allocate the in-quota quantity of a TRQ for any agricultural product among supplying countries or customs areas. The President delegated this authority to the United States Trade Representative under Presidential Proclamation 6763 (60 FR 1007, January 4, 1995). On July 25, 2017 (82 FR 34472), the Secretary of Agriculture announced an additional in-quota quantity of the TRQ for raw cane sugar for the remainder of FY2017 (ending September 30, 2017) in the amount of 244,690 metric tons raw value (MTRV). The conversion factor is 1 metric ton equals1.10231125 short tons. This quantity is in addition to the minimum amount to which the United States is committed under the World Trade Organization
(WTO)Uruguay Round Agreements (1,117,195 MTRV). The Department of Agriculture also has determined that all sugar entering the United States under the FY2017 raw sugar TRQ will be permitted to enter U.S. Customs territory through October 31, 2017, a month later than the typical entry date deadline. USTR is allocating this total quantity of 244,690 MTRV to the following countries in the amounts specified below: Country FY2017 raw cane sugar increase
(MTRV)Argentina 15,575 Australia 30,064 Belize 3,984 Brazil 13,962 Colombia 8,693 Costa Rica 5,433 Ecuador 3,984 El Salvador 9,417 Fiji 3,260 Guatemala 17,386 Guyana 4,347 Honduras 3,622 India 2,898 Jamaica 3,984 Malawi 3,622 Mauritius 4,347 Mozambique 4,709 Nicaragua 7,606 Panama 10,504 Peru 14,851 Philippines 48,898 South Africa 8,331 Swaziland 5,795 Thailand 5,071 Zimbabwe 4,347 USTR based these allocations on the countries' historical shipments to the United States. The allocations of the raw cane sugar TRQ to countries that are net importers of sugar are conditioned on receipt of the appropriate verifications of origin, and certificates for quota eligibility must accompany imports from any country for which an allocation has been provided. Sharon E. Bomer Lauritsen, Assistant U.S. Trade Representative, Agricultural Affairs and Commodity Policy. [FR Doc. 2017-16288 Filed 7-31-17; 11:15 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Traces to 1 document
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.