Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2017-07-18 · National Protection and Programs Directorate, DHS · Notices

Notices. 60-Day notice and request for comments

666 words·~3 min read·/register/2017/07/18/2017-15067

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 9110-12-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY [Docket No. DHS-2017-0032] New Information Collection Request: The Department of Homeland Security, Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, US-CERT.gov Collection AGENCY: National Protection and Programs Directorate, DHS. ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments. SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD), Office of Cybersecurity and Communications (CS&C), National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center (NCCIC), United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT) will submit the following Information Collection Request to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until September 18, 2017. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1. ADDRESSES: Written comments and questions about this Information Collection Request should be forwarded to DHS/NPPD/CS&C/NCCIC/US-CERT, 245 Murray Lane, SW., Mail Stop 0640, Arlington,VA 20598-0640. Emailed requests should go to *info@us-cert.gov.* Written comments should reach the contact person listed no later than September 18, 2017. Comments must be identified by “DHS-2017-0032” and may be submitted by *one* of the following methods: • *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.* • *Email: info@us-cert.gov* Include the docket number “DHS-2017-0032” in the subject line of the message. *Instructions:* All submissions received must include the words “Department of Homeland Security” and the docket number for this action. Comments received will be posted without alteration at *http://www.regulations.gov,* including any personal information provided. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: US-CERT is responsible for performing, coordinating, and supporting response to information security incidents, which may originate outside the Federal community and affect users within it, or originate within the Federal community and affect users outside of it. Often, therefore, the effective handling of security incidents relies on information sharing among individual users, industry, and the Federal Government, which may be facilitated by and through US-CERT. US-CERT fulfills the role of the Federal information security incident center for the United States Federal Government as defined in the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014. Each Federal agency is required to notify and consult with US-CERT regarding information security incidents involving the information and information systems (managed by a Federal agency, contractor, or other source) that support the operations and assets of the agency. Additional entities report incident information to US-CERT voluntarily. Per the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014, as codified in subchapter II of chapter 35 of title 44 of the United States Code, US-CERT must inform operators of agency information systems about current and potential information security threats and vulnerabilities. Per the Homeland Security Act, as amended, the NCCIC, of which US-CERT and ICS-CERT are a part, is required to be the Federal civilian interface for sharing cybersecurity risks, incidents, analysis, and warnings for federal and non-Federal entities. OMB is particularly interested in comments that: 1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; 2. Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; 3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and 4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, *e.g.,* permitting electronic submissions of responses. Analysis *Agency:* Department of Homeland Security, National Protection and Programs Directorate, Office of Cybersecurity and Communications, National Cybersecurity and Communications Integration Center, United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team. *Title:* Clearance for the Collection of Routine Feedback through *US-CERT.gov.* *OMB Number:* 1670—NEW. *Frequency:* Ongoing. *Affected Public:* Voluntary respondents. *Number of Respondents:* 126,325 respondents (estimate). *Estimated Time per Respondent:* 3 minutes. *Total Burden Hours:* 6,140 annual burden hours. *Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):* $0. *Total Recordkeeping Burden:* $0. *Total Burden Cost (operating/maintaining):* $0. David Epperson, Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2017-15067 Filed 7-17-17; 8:45 am]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • 5 CFR 1320.1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
60-Day notice and request for comments
Cite5 CFR 1320.1
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.