Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2017-04-04 · Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Notices

Notices. Renewal of existing information collection; request for comment

1,032 words·~5 min read·/register/2017/04/04/2017-06633·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC-2016-0129] Information Collection: Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Renewal of existing information collection; request for comment. SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC)invites public comment on the renewal of Office of Management and Budget
(OMB)approval for an existing collection of information. The information collection is entitled, “Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.” DATES: Submit comments by June 5, 2017. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods: • *Federal Rulemaking Web site:* Go to *http://www.regulations.gov* and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0129. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-3463; email: *Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov.* For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • *Mail comments to:* David Cullison, Office of the Chief Information Officer, Mail Stop: T-2 F43, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see “Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments” in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Cullison, Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2084; email: *INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0129 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods: • *Federal rulemaking Web site:* Go to *http://www.regulations.gov* and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0129. A copy of the collection of information and related instructions may be obtained without charge by accessing Docket ID NRC-2016-0129 on this Web site. • *NRC's PDR:* You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. • *NRC's Clearance Officer:* A copy of the collection of information and related instructions may be obtained without charge by contacting NRC's Clearance Officer, David Cullison, Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2084; email: *INFOCOLLECTS.Resource@NRC.GOV* . B. Submitting Comments Please include Docket ID NRC-2016-0129 in the subject line of your comment submission, in order to ensure that the NRC is able to make your comment submission available to the public in this docket. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information in comment submissions that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at *http://www.regulations.gov* as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS, and the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS. II. Background In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the NRC is requesting public comment on its intention to request the OMB's approval for the information collection summarized below. 1. *The title of the information collection:* 10 CFR part 52, “Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.” 2. *OMB approval number:* 3150-0151. 3. *Type of submission:* Extension. 4. *The form number, if applicable:* Not applicable. 5. *How often the collection is required or requested:* On occasion. Applications are submitted only when licensing action is sought. 6. *Who will be required or asked to respond:* Applicants for early site permits (ESPs), standard design approvals
(SDAs)and certifications, manufacturing licenses (MLs), and licenses which combine construction permits
(CPs)and conditional operating licenses (OLs), *e.g.* COLs, for commercial nuclear power reactors. 7. *The estimated number of annual responses:* 1,175 (1,150 reporting responses plus 25 recordkeepers). 8. *The estimated number of annual respondents:* 25. 9. *The estimated number of hours needed annually to comply with the information collection requirement or request:* 243,854 hours (22,414 hours reporting plus 23,440 hours recordkeeping). 10. *Abstract:* The licensing processes in part 52 of title 10 of the *Code of Federal Regulations* (10 CFR) provide for issuance of ESPs, SDAs, MLs, CPs, and COLs for commercial nuclear power reactors. The applicants submit updated reports, applications for renewals, exemption requests and maintain records of changes to the facility and records of detailed design related information. These licensing procedures are options to the two-step licensing process in 10 CFR part 50, which provides for a CP and an OL. The part 52 licensing process places procedural requirements in part 52 and technical requirements in part 50. Part 52 reduces the overall paperwork burden borne by applicants for CPs and OLs because part 52 only requires a single application and provides options for referencing standardized designs. The information in 10 CFR part 52 is needed by the agency to assess the adequacy and suitability of an applicant's site, plant design, construction, training and experience, plans and procedures for the protection of public health and safety. III. Specific Requests for Comment The NRC is seeking comments that address the following questions: 1. Is the proposed collection of information necessary for the NRC to properly perform its functions? Does the information have practical utility? 2. Is the estimate of the burden of the information collection accurate? 3. Is there a way to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected? 4. How can the burden of the information collection on respondents be minimized, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology? Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 30th day of March, 2017. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. David Cullison, NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2017-06633 Filed 4-3-17; 8:45 am]
Connections2 off-index
2 references not yet in our index
  • 10 CFR 52
  • 10 CFR 50
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Renewal of existing information collection; request for comment
Cite10 CFR 52
Cite10 CFR 50
Cites 2Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.