Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-12-28 · Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board) · Notices

Notices. Notice

705 words·~3 min read·/register/2016/12/28/2016-31371·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM [Docket No. 1530; RIN 7100 AE 44] Regulation Q; Regulatory Capital Rules: Risk-Based Capital Surcharges for Global Systemically Important Bank Holding Companies AGENCY: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board). ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: Under the rule of the Board regarding risk-based capital surcharges for global systemically important bank holding companies (GSIB surcharge rule), the Board is providing notice of the aggregate global indicator amounts for purposes of a calculation that is required under the GSIB surcharge rule for 2016.
DATES: *Effective:* December 28, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juan C. Climent, Manager,
(202)872-7526, or Holly Kirkpatrick, Supervisory Financial Analyst,
(202)452-2796, Division of Supervision and Regulation; or Mark Buresh, Senior Attorney,
(202)452-5270, or Mary Watkins, Attorney,
(202)452-3722, Legal Division. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 20th and C Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551. For the hearing impaired only, Telecommunications Device for the Deaf
(TDD)users may contact
(202)263-4869. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board's GSIB surcharge rule establishes a methodology to identify global systemically important bank holding companies in the United States (GSIBs) based on indicators that are correlated with systemic importance. 1 Under the GSIB surcharge rule, a firm must calculate its GSIB score using a specific formula (Method 1). Method 1 uses five equally weighted categories that are correlated with systemic importance—size, interconnectedness, cross-jurisdictional activity, substitutability, and complexity—and subdivided into twelve systemic indicators. For each indicator, a firm divides its own measure of each systemic indicator by an aggregate global indicator amount. The firm's Method 1 score is the sum of its weighted systemic indicator scores expressed in basis points. The GSIB surcharge for the firm is then the higher of the GSIB surcharge determined under Method 1 and a second method that weights size, interconnectedness, cross-jurisdictional activity, complexity, and a measure of a firm's reliance on wholesale funding (instead of substitutability). 2 1 *See* 12 CFR 217.402, 217.404. 2 The second method (Method 2) uses similar inputs to those used in Method 1, but replaces the substitutability category with a measure of a firm's use of short-term wholesale funding. In addition, Method 2 is calibrated differently from Method 1. The aggregate global indicator amounts used in the score calculation under Method 1 are based on data collected by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). The BCBS amounts are determined based on the sum of the systemic indicator scores of the 75 largest U.S. and foreign banking organizations as measured by the BCBS, and any other banking organization that the BCBS includes in its sample total for that year. The BCBS publicly releases these values, denominated in euros, each year. Pursuant to the GSIB surcharge rule, the Board publishes the aggregate global indicator amounts each year as denominated in U.S. dollars using the euro-dollar exchange rate provided by the BCBS. 3 3 12 CFR 217.404(b)(1)(i)(B); 80 FR 49082, 49086-87 (August 14, 2015). *See also* 81 FR 1948 (January 14, 2016). The indicators provided by the BCBS were converted to U.S. dollars using a euro-dollar exchange rate of 1.0887, which was the daily euro to U.S. dollar spot rate on December 31, 2015 as published by the European Central Bank (available at *http://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/eurofxref/index.en.html* ). The aggregate global indicator amounts for purposes of the Method 1 score calculation for 2016 under § 217.404(b)(1)(i)(B) of the GSIB surcharge rule are: Aggregate Global Indicator Amounts in U.S. Dollars
(USD)for 2016 Category Systemic indicator Aggregate global indicator amount (in USD) Size Total exposures $79,320,039,989,625 Interconnectedness Intra-financial system assets 8,816,910,460,396 Intra-financial system liabilities 9,687,826,596,896 Securities outstanding 13,608,077,367,510 Substitutability Payments activity 2,463,117,556,410,060 Assets under custody 139,725,689,815,229 Underwritten transactions in debt and equity markets 6,479,589,781,461 Complexity Notional amount of over-the-counter
(OTC)derivatives 606,217,201,548,411 Trading and available-for-sale
(AFS)securities 3,543,254,277,404 Level 3 assets 637,946,551,935 Cross-jurisdictional activity Cross-jurisdictional claims Cross-jurisdictional liabilities 19,333,877,366,660 17,293,028,759,406 Authority: 12 U.S.C. 248(a), 321-338a, 481-486, 1462a, 1467a, 1818, 1828, 1831n, 1831o, 1831p-l, 1831w, 1835, 1844(b), 1851, 3904, 3906-3909, 4808, 5365, 5368, 5371. By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, acting through the Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation under delegated authority, December 22, 2016. Robert deV. Frierson, Secretary of the Board. [FR Doc. 2016-31371 Filed 12-27-16; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 3
Citation graph
cites case law
Cites 3Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.