Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-11-08 · Food and Drug Administration, HHS · Notices

Notices. Notice of availability; request for comments

1,070 words·~5 min read·/register/2016/11/08/2016-26913

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 4154-01-P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA-2016-N-3362] Intent To Review a Study Data Standardization Plan Template; Notice of Availability; Establishment of a Public Docket; Request for Comments AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, is establishing a public docket to collect comments related to a proposed Study Data Standardization Plan
(SDSP)template. As part of FDA's ongoing collaboration with the Pharmaceutical Users Software Exchange (PhUSE), an independent, non-profit consortium addressing computational science issues, a PhUSE working group developed the PhUSE SDSP template. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the template and determine whether FDA will recommend its use either as is, or in a modified form, for regulatory submissions of study data. FDA is seeking public comment on the use of the PhUSE SDSP template for regulatory submissions. DATES: Although you can comment on the PhUSE SDSP template at any time, to ensure that the Agency considers your comments in this review, please submit either electronic or written comments by January 9, 2017. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows: Electronic Submissions Submit electronic comments in the following way: • *Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.* Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted electronically, including attachments, to *http://www.regulations.gov* will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not include any confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else's Social Security number, or confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in the body of your comments, that information will be posted on *http://www.regulations.gov.* • If you want to submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made available to the public, submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner detailed (see “Written/Paper Submissions” and “Instructions”). Written/Paper Submissions Submit written/paper submissions as follows: • *Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper submissions):* Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. • For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified, as confidential, if submitted as detailed in “Instructions.” *Instructions:* All submissions received must include the Docket No. FDA-2016-N-3362 for “Intent to Review a Study Data Standardization Plan Template.” Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as “Confidential Submissions,” publicly viewable at *http://www.regulations.gov* or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. • Confidential Submissions—To submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states “THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.” The Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing and posted on *http://www.regulations.gov.* Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this information as “confidential.” Any information marked as “confidential” will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: *http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.* *Docket:* For access to the docket to read background documents or the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to *http://www.regulations.gov* and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the “Search” box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Allard, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 21, Rm. 1518, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-8856, *crystal.allard@fda.hhs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background FDA is a participating member of PhUSE, an independent, non-profit consortium of academic, regulatory, non-profit, and private sector entities. PhUSE provides a global platform for the discussion of topics encompassing the work of biostatisticians, data managers, statistical programmers, and e-clinical information technology professionals, with the mission of providing an open, transparent, and collaborative forum to address computational science issues. As part of this collaboration, PhUSE working groups develop and periodically publish proposals for enhancing the review and analysis of human and animal study data submitted to regulatory agencies. You can learn more about PhUSE working groups at *http://www.phuse.eu/cs-working-groups.aspx.* (FDA has verified the Web site addresses as of the date this document publishes in the **Federal Register** , but Web sites are subject to change over time.) In December 2014, FDA published the Study Data Technical Conformance Guide (the “Guide,” available at *http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StudyDataStandards/default.htm* ), which contains technical recommendations to sponsors for the submission of animal and human study data and related information in a standardized electronic format. In section 2.1 of the Guide, FDA recommends that sponsors should include a plan ( *e.g.,* in the IND) describing the submission of standardized study data to FDA. FDA's Study Data Standards Resources Web page provides recommendations for preparing an SDSP ( *http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/DataStandards/StudyDataStandards/UCM447119.pdf* ). FDA now intends to review the PhUSE SDSP template, a deliverable of the working group effort described previously in this document, with the potential result that FDA could recommend the use of the template in its current form, or in a modified form, for use in the regulatory submission of study data in conformance with the Guide. FDA invites public comment on all matters regarding the use of the PhUSE SDSP template. II. Electronic Access The PhUSE SDSP template is available at: *http://www.phusewiki.org/wiki/images/e/ea/SDSP_Template.pdf.* Dated: November 2, 2016. Leslie Kux, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2016-26913 Filed 11-7-16; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of availability; request for comments
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.