Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-09-28 · Transportation Security Administration, DHS · Notices

Notices. Notice of availability

545 words·~2 min read·/register/2016/09/28/2016-23370

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Transportation Security Administration [Docket No. TSA-2016-0001] RIN 1652-ZA20 Legal Interpretation of “Field of Transportation” AGENCY: Transportation Security Administration, DHS. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: The Transportation Security Administration
(TSA)is providing notice that it has issued a legal interpretation of the phrase “field of transportation” that is referenced in the statute requiring TSA to charge fees to recover the cost of its vetting services. By defining this term, TSA clarifies the individuals from whom we may collect and retain fees to recover vetting costs. This interpretation does not address the term “field of transportation” as it is used in other laws or contexts. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Beyer, Senior Counsel, Regulations and Security Standards, Office of the Chief Counsel, TSA-2, Transportation Security Administration, 601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 20598-6002; telephone
(571)227-2702; email *Christine.beyer@tsa.dhs.gov.* SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Over the past decade, some Federal agencies and stakeholders have asked TSA whether their employees could enroll for security vetting and pay fees to TSA for this service. In these cases, it was clear that the individuals at issue were in transportation because they were transporting dangerous goods in commercial vehicles. However, recently we have received inquiries concerning the delineation of where transportation begins and ends where the answer is not so apparent. Several key stakeholder groups have asked which employees, employers, or activities in the chemical industry fall within the scope of “field of transportation” in TSA's fee statute, sec. 469(a) of title 6 of the U.S. Code (6 U.S.C. 469(a)), and could pay for TSA's vetting services through user fees. The fee statute requires TSA to charge reasonable fees for providing credentialing and background investigations in the “field of transportation” but does not define the populations or types of workers included in the field of transportation. It is necessary to interpret the language so that TSA and chemical industry employers and workers all understand the individuals who may pay user fees that TSA can retain to recover vetting costs. This interpretation states that the “field of transportation” under 6 U.S.C. 469(a) includes an individual, activity, entity, facility, owner, or operator that is subject to regulation by TSA, DOT, or the U.S. Coast Guard, and individuals applying for trusted traveler programs. Publication of this notice of availability in the **Federal Register** provides public notice that the full interpretation is available for review and downloading from TSA's electronic public docket on the Internet and a link to the docket on TSA's Web site. TSA will also share the interpretation with stakeholders through industry engagement meetings and with appropriate Congressional Committee staff. Document Availability You can get an electronic copy of both this notice and the interpretation of the field of transportation as it is used in 6 U.S.C. 469(a) on the Internet by—
(1)Searching the electronic Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS)Web page at *http://www.regulations.gov,* Docket No. TSA-2016-0001; or
(2)Accessing TSA's Web pages at *https://www.tsa.gov/for-industry/hazmat-endorsement, https://www.tsa.gov/for-industry/twic* and *https://www.tsa.gov/for-industry/surface-transportation.* In addition, copies are available by writing or calling the individual in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Make sure to identify the docket number of this rulemaking. Dated: September 22, 2016. Susan M. Prosnitz, Deputy Chief Counsel, Regulations and Security Standards. [FR Doc. 2016-23370 Filed 9-27-16; 8:45 am]
Connectionstraces to 1
Citation graph
cites case law
Notices
Notice of availability
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.