Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-07-19 · SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

300 words·~1 min read·/register/2016/07/19/2016-17167

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meeting Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Friday, July 22, 2016 at 10:30 a.m., in the Auditorium (L-002) at the Commission's headquarters building, to hear oral argument in an appeal from an initial decision of an administrative law judge by respondent Thomas C.
Gonnella. On November 13, 2014, the ALJ found that Respondent violated antifraud provisions, and aided and abetted and caused violations of recordkeeping provisions, of the securities laws while associated with Barclays, a dually registered broker-dealer and investment adviser. Specifically, the ALJ found that Respondent engaged in a fraudulent trading scheme in order to avoid aged-inventory charges that were implemented under Barclays's internal policy and yet retain the securities that were subject to the policy.
The ALJ also found that Gonnella's failure to record the transactions properly caused Barclays's books and records to be incomplete and inaccurate and that Gonnella therefore aided and abetted and was a cause of recordkeeping violations. For these violations, the ALJ suspended Respondent from the securities industry and from participation in penny stock offerings for twelve months, entered a cease-and-desist order, and assessed a civil money penalty of $82,500. The Division of Enforcement appealed the suspension, and Respondent cross-appealed the findings of violations and sanctions imposed.
The issues likely to be considered at oral argument include, among other things, whether Respondent violated the securities laws and, if so, what sanction, if any, is appropriate in the public interest. For further information, please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at
(202)551-5400. Dated: July 15, 2016. Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-17167 Filed 7-15-16; 4:15 pm]
Connections1 off-index
1 reference not yet in our index
  • Pub. L. 94-409
Citation graph
cites case law
Proposed Rules
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Pub. L.Pub. L. 94-409
Cites 1Cited by 0 across 0 sources
★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.