Tap any paragraph to write a margin note. Your notes collect in the Desk below the text and file under cases with @. The side-by-side margin rail opens on a larger screen.

Code · REGISTER · 2016-07-13 · Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT) · Proposed Rules

Proposed Rules. Request for public comment on FRA's Capital Cost Estimating Guidance

644 words·~3 min read·/register/2016/07/13/2016-16544·

A research copy — for the controlling text, always check the official state or federal source. Not legal advice.

Agency: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT)
Action: Request for public comment on FRA's Capital Cost Estimating Guidance
Citation: FR Doc. 2016-16544 · Docket No. FRA-2016-0035

Summary

FRA invites public comment on its Capital Cost Estimating Guidance, available on FRA's Web site at .

Dates

Submit comments on or before August 29, 2016.

Supplementary Information

FRA developed this guidance document on capital cost estimating for project sponsors and the industry as part of its continuing efforts to provide technical assistance and ensure successful project delivery. FRA's guidance emphasizes accuracy, comprehensiveness, and completeness of estimating materials, as well as credibility. These are all qualities highlighted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) in its own capital cost estimating guidance, which describes the same primary capital cost estimating methodologies and activities as stated in this document. FRA's guidance focuses specifically on railroad projects; it provides examples of common estimating shortfalls in railroad projects; and it defines agency-specific requirements for project sponsors regarding format and submission of cost estimate-related materials. FRA recognizes that it is not always easy to persuade stakeholders and funders of a project's merit, or to withstand criticism for capital costs that seem “too high” and schedules that seem “too long.” The pressures associated with project development and implementation can be immense. GAO recognized these pressures when it stated, “many organizations are not mature enough to acknowledge . . . cost risk realism because of the possible repercussions [and] . . . fear that the program could be canceled.” With this in mind, FRA's guidance asserts that true or “non-depressed” costs can get funded, and reminds us that delivering projects “as promised” increases industry credibility. By following FRA's guidance, project sponsors should be better able to compensate for uncertainties, unforeseen conditions, and unknowns in capital cost estimates. Such should improve estimate reliability, and enable as-built costs to land within a reasonable range of the estimates generated at every project phase. With a consistent estimating approach, project sponsors should be better able to make useful comparisons among estimates, and to evaluate their own estimates. This guidance will be incorporated by reference into FRA's Notices of Funding Availability/Opportunity and grant and loan agreements. FRA expects project sponsors to adhere to this guidance, and the principles and methods described herein. Privacy Act FRA wishes to inform all interested parties that anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). Interested parties may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000, 65 FR 19477, or see for the privacy notice of regulations.gov. Issued in Washington, DC, on July 7, 2016. Paul Nissenbaum, Associate Administrator for Railroad Policy and Development. [FR Doc. 2016-16544 Filed 7-12-16; 8:45 am]

★   the supreme law of the land   ★
Don't Tread on Me
E Pluribus Unum — out of many, one

"If you don't know your rights, you don't have any."

Marginalia · a citizen's law index
A research desk, not legal advice. Always read the cited source before relying on a summary.
Questions or an issue? support@self-law.org
disclaimerMarginalia is a research index, not a law firm. Nothing on this site is legal, tax, or financial advice and no attorney–client relationship is formed by using it. Statutes, regulations, and case law change; summaries, search results, AI output, and member posts may be incomplete, out of date, or wrong. Any interpretation drawn from material on this site should be validated by a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before you act on it.